07 October, 2026

YAMHAD KINGDOM

It was the Yaminite tribe of Amorites, semi-nomadic confederation centered on pastoralism-based structure, which evolved from mobile herding communities, who settled in Halab (Aleppo). These tribes, including subgroups like the Banjaminites and Hanaeans, maintained seasonal migration routes (nighum) for grazing and water access, radiating from core areas in the Middle Euphrates toward Halab (modern day Aleppo in Syria), fostering a shared ethnic identity rooted in extended family ties and assemblies (puhur amurrim) for decision-making. Their peaceful life in Halab was disturbed by Yahdun-Lim (c.1728-1680), the successor of  Yaggid-Lim of the kingdom of Mari 186 miles distant from Halab. Expansionism was started by Yaggid-Lim, the chieftain of a Simalite (Banū Simʾal) pastoralist group in Suprum and Terqa who turned to be the first king of Lim dynasty after ending the Shakkanakku period in Mari and making alliance with Ila-kabkabu, the Amorite king of 400-km distant Ekallatum. Yaggid-Lim's center was at Terqa - because of his family there. He was the king of a domain of nomadic Amorite pastoral territory along the river -- although there were a lot of rejections outside and inside his area.
Due to Yaggid-Lim’s expansionism and territorial disputes, he being the king of Mari violated his treaty with Ila-kabkabu  (c.1730 BCE). Ila-kabkabu responded with raids that led to the capture of Yaggid-Lim’s heir, Prince Yahdun-Lim, effectively breaking their pact -- as Yaggid-Lim himself had not respected their mutual defense treaty against emerging regional threats in the north, when he himself was the threat, as recorded on a Mari tablet. Prince Yahdun-Lim was eventually released. If Mari could do this to his own ally, Ila-kabkabu, then Yaggid-Lim would have been even more likely to do the same to Yamhad (Halab), and by this harshness why Yamhad was founded as kingdom in Halab.
Simalites and Yaminites were two major groups of Amorite confederations along the Euphrates with Yaggit-Lim of Mari heading the former and Sumu-Epuh of Yamhad leading the latter.

SUMU-EPUH, FOUNDER OF THE YAMHAD KINGDOM

The leader of the Halab Yaminite tribe, Sumu-Epuh (c.1714-1679) was the first to be called "King of Yamhad" and was related to Mari's people via Amorite tribes, but like six other tribal chiefts, Sumu-Epuh was against the king of Mari.
The first to show resistance and launch an incursion was Ila-kabkabu, an Amorite tribal chief who took Suprum in 1721 BCE, likely from Yahdun-Lim (c.1728-1680). A year later Ila-kabkabu died and his authority was absorbed by Aminu, the elder son who had his own kingdom and now annexed Ekallatum, as we can infer from the eponym chronicle, although Shamshi-Adad, the younger son, entered Ila-kabkabu's house, perhaps as a viceroy of Aminu in Ekallatum. Aminu is attested on the seal of a servant and might have reigned near the border of Mari. 
That Suprum, mentioned earlier, was likely captured by Hammurabi in the latter's Year 11 in 1687-1686 BCE as a consequence of the Babylonian king's capture of Rapiqum 40 km to the south.
In the year of a solar eclipse, 1706 BCE, Aminu was likely defeated by Ipiq-Adad II (r.1719-1701) and was killed. With Aminu's fall, Shamshi-Adad was "born" into kingship (REL 126-127 & 154-155). Then in 1704 BCE, Shamshi-Adad might have defeated Dur-Yahdun-Lim port: this fortress city was built by the Mariote king near Deir ez-Zor several decades earlier when Yahdun-Lim took control of the Banks of the Euphrates for business reasons several years before subduing seven tribes in the region. 

"Yahdun-Lim, son of Yaggid-Lim, king of Mari, Tuttul, and the land of Hana, mighty king who controls the 

Banks of the Euphrates.

 [The god] Dagan proclaimed my kingship... I took prisoner seven kings who had fought against me. I annexed their lands. I undid the damage to the Banks of the Euphrates and restored peace to my land. I opened canals. I caused my land to lose the habit of drawing water. I built the wall of Mari..." -- Louvre AO 18236

Mari might have control of Supur-Shamash,  Ashtabala, Ashnakkum, and Tarnip, which were among the Banks of Euphrates and were seized in 1701-1700 BCE by king Naram-Suen, which entails that Yahdun-Lim of Mari had no choice but to be an ally of the newly enthroned king of Eshnunna. This alliance surprised Shamshi-Adad I, who was unprepared for any huge attack. In his regnal Year 3, Naram-Suen successfully captured Ekallatum (1699-1698 BCE), compelling Shamshi-Adad to seek refuge in Babylon (most likely, to king Sin-mubalit). Prior that, Naram-Suen reminded Shamshi-Adad that even Shinam could have helped with military, it's proven it had not saved Nerebtum, Urshitum, Diniktum, or Mankisum for being exhausted and abandoned. 

Naram-Suen of Eshnunna took control of karum Kanesh until in the 35th regnal year of Naram-Sin of Assyria when the karum (trade center) was completely burned to the ground (1694 BCE), a fierce battle that started in 1696 BCE, the very same year when Shamshi-Adad left Babylon for Ekallatum. Shamshi-Adad stayed 3 years in Ekallatum until the death of Naram-Suen in 1691 BCE. The chaos in Eshnunna that followed and the weakness of Ekallatum left Yamhad safe from outsider intrusions for a while.
Timeline:
1721: Ila-kabkabu took Suprum.
1720: Ila-kabkabu died, succeeded by Aminu and viceroy Shamshi-Adad I.
1706: solar eclipse: Ipiq-Adad II defeated Aminu, birth of Shamshi-Adad to kingship.
1704: Shamshi-Adad probably defeated Dur-Yahdun-Lim.
1701: Ipiq-Adad II died and was succeeded by Naram-Suen, who was victorious over the Banks of the Euphrates, and may have made alliance with Yahdun-Lim.
1698: Shamshi-Adad fled to Babylon after Naram-Suen conquered Ekallatum.
1696: Sin-mubalit died and succeeded by Hammurabi, possible reason why Shamshi-Adad left Babylon to go to Ekallatum with his son Ishme-Dagan. Battle in karum Kanesh started. Start of the regnal year of Shamshi-Adad and Hammurabi.
1694: karum Kanesh was completely burned. Shamshi-Adad stayed in Ekallatum. Start of regnal service of Ishme-Dagan I.
1691: Naram-Suen died, and chaos followed in Eshnunna. 
1687: Hammurabi seized Rapiqum, perhaps including Suprum.


1687 BCE
Yamhadite city of Tuba, which was a personal possession of Sumu-Epuh's royal family, was attacked by Qatna king Amarpiel I (c.1700-c.1687), Mariote king Yaddun-Lim and Hammu-Nabih (probably king of Tuttul) in c.1687 BCE and took a large booty.

The situation later shifted, however, when the Yaminites chiefs in Tuttul began planning to attack Yahdun-lim instead. Sumu-Epuh, although was 300 kilometers distant from them, encouraged this plan. The resistance was a response to Yahdun-Lim's expansionism, particularly when in 1684 BCE his ships took expedition on Mediterranean Sea, trespassing the region of Yamhad and endangering the nearby cities.

1684 BCE

To protect Halab, Alalakh, and Tuba from the Mariote king Yahdun-Lim, Sumu-Epuh sent support to Tuttul. They engaged Yahdun-Lim, but were defeated at its gates. At Sagaratum, Yahdun-Lim captured the local kings, asserting dominance over the nomadic groups between Emar and Mari — groups that Sumu-Epuh of Yamhad had incited against him in response to Yahdun-Lim’s western interventions. This victory led Yahdun-Lim to be proclaimed sarrum dannum ("mighty king")  over Mari, Tuttul, and the Hanaean nomads along the Euphrates.

Although the Mariote king had defeated the seven chiefs of the Banjaminites, Yahdun-Lim refrained from open war with Yamhad (Aleppo). The reason was clear: Shamshi-Adad, who might have fought his troops in Dur-Yahdun-Lim and who was controlling karum Kanesh, was now advancing on Mari, and that threat left Sumu-Epuh of Yamhad no alternative but to join with Yahdun-Lim to oppose Shamshi-Adad I.  In 1684 BCE Sumu-Epuh dispatched his son, Prince Yarim-Lim, eastward to provide military support to another Amorite ruler of Der, on the border of Elam. For the next four years Shamshi-Adad pressed his war against Yahdun-Lim, steadily exhausting Mari’s armies, treasury, and grain stores.

1681 BCE

As early as 1681 up to 1670 BCE, Yarim-Lim stationed and, as a consequence, sunk 500 warships at Diniktum — at modern Tell Muhammad in Baghdad, in the Diyala region near the northern border of Elam — likely at the request of its king, Sin-gamil, an ally. In a letter to Yasub-Yahad dated to around 1670 BCE, Yarim-Lim explained his decision:

 "Indeed. Sin-gamil, king of Diniktum, has repeatedly responded to me with lies and provocations, just as you do. I docked 500 boats at Diniktum’s quay and supported his land and him for 12 years!" — Tablet A.1314

"Sin-gamil, [was] the great leader of the Martu [i .e. Amorite chief] of the city of Diniktum, son of Sin-semi" as mentioned in brick inscription, and it was during the days of Hammurabi of Babylon (1696–1654) and Zimri-Lim of Mari (1680–1663 BCE).
The deployment of 500 warships indicates that the Kingdom of Yamhad was both wealthy and militarily powerful -- the reason why Yamhad dynasty became famous than any previous dynasties in Halab. And this may explain why Shamshi-Adad targeted first the weaker Mari than to combat the stronger Yamhad Kingdom, beside of the fact that Mari was on front of Aleppo and Yamhad could muster allies near Ekallatum. 


1680 BCE

In his Year 16 as king of Ekallatum, Shamshi-Adad was ravaging Assyria before turning west toward Syria.
Yahdun-Lim recorded four year-names of his battle against Shamshi-Adad I, until in 1681-1680 BCE when  eponyms chronicle reported that:

"During the eponymy of Atanum, Shamshi-Adad defeated 12 kings; [one of which] Yahdun-Lim king of Mari..." -- REL 180

Another casualty of this war was likely Erishum II, king of Assyria. 
"In the eponymy of Atamar-Ishtar, Shamshi-Adad went up from Ekallatum. He ousted Erishum, son of Naram-Sin, from the throne and took it.." (AKL)

So, later Assyrian chronologists might have rewritten "Atanum" as "Atamar," changing "n" into "r" or by erroneously seeing "-um" as "-ar."

After ousting Erishum II, Shamshi-Adad proclaimed himself “Governor of Ashur.” This followed an old Assyrian tradition going back to Tudiya Adamu — “Adam, Beloved of Yah” — that Assyria could have only one true king: the God. The human ruler was merely God’s viceroy, called governor or mayor. Shamshi-Adad respected this designation. 

In Mari archives,  however, Shamshi-Adad is called 
“King of Assyria," 
whereas in Mesopotamia (c.1677 BCE) he styled himself 

“King of Subartu."

He also took the title “Unifier of the Land of the Euphrates and Tigris,” a phrase later probably reused by the first king of Mitanni as 'shar matim' (“King of the Land”),  Unifier of Greater Hana.

Around 1680 BCE he transferred the capital from Ekallatum to Shekhna, which he renamed "Shubat-Enlil." 

And then he granted Ekallatum to his elder son, Ishme-Dagan I, who might have served as his viceroy since the year he stayed at Ekallatum after leaving Babylon.

Following this, Shamshi-Adad set his sights on king Yahdun-Lim, striking at Mari - a city whose strategic location promised both military advantage and control over major trade.

This incident was taken advantage of by Sumu-Yaman, who was vying for the Mariote throne. Seeing a chance against the weakened Mariote forces, he probably conspired with the Mariote king's servants to kill Yahdun-Lim in the palace -- an act that,  in the eyes of Mari people, benefited Shamshi-Adad. So, if you cannot defeat your enemy by outside forces, use inside greedy men, such as what possibly happened to Yaggit-Lim. Upon learning what had happened to his father or grandfather, prince Zimri-Lim fled -- by his mother Addu-duri -- to Aleppo, where king Sumu-Epuh  had no choice but to welcome him. Anyway, Zimri-Lim would be a useful instrument against Shamshi-Adad I. Sumu-Epuh had to enfeoff (gift) the land of Alakhtum to Zimri-Lim for refuge, where the latter probably first established his office. This made Zimri-Lim a vassal of Sumu-Epuh in return and Alakhtum (Alalakh) as vice kingdom.

YARIM-LIM, 2nd KING OF YAMHAD 


Yarim-Lim was approached by Nur-Sin, Zimri-Lim’s ambassador to Aleppo, and was negotiated with two key agreements:
The ambassador arranged 
an alliance between the Mariote prince and king Yarim-Lim, and 
the marriage of Yarim-Lim’s daughter Shibtu to Zimri-Lim. 

Additionally, the ambassador had delivered a prophecy from the god Addu of Aleppo relayed by a prophetess, who declared: 
“Addu, lord of Aleppo, has given you [Zimri-Lim] the land of Mari as a gift, and no one will stand against you."
 Victory is promised to Zimri-Lim, which only completely materialized after the death of Shamshi-Adad I in the 32nd year name of Hammurabi.

Two days after the wedding ceremony, Sumu-Epuh's queen consort Sumunna-Abi, the mother of Yarim-Lim, died. Thereafter Yarim-Lim won a series of victories that earned him the title “Great King.”

In a later letter, ambassador Nur-Sin requested that Zimri-Lim cede the estate of Alakhtum (Alalakh) to Aleppo. Alalakh likely served as Zimri-Lim’s temporary administrative center during his stay away from Mari (1680-1665). This corresponds to what archaeologists call Alalakh Level VII. The level yielded a palace, archive, temples, city wall, tripartite gate, houses, workshops, and burial both inside and outside the walls.

Between 2015–2019 during excavations of the Level VII palace, more than 70 wall-painting fragments were recovered and radiocarbon-dated to c. 1680 BCE.

Around 1680 BCE, Yarim-Lim conquered the city of Tuttul. Conquering Tuttul was like conquering Mari, because it was part of the Mariote Kingdom, as Yahdun-Lim was once known as
"the king of Mari, Tuttul, and the land of Hana."
Yarim-Lim declare his ally, prince Zimri-Lim [1680 BCE], as the heir to the throne of Mari, and as the appointed king of Mari's Kingdom (1679 BCE) and installed him as governor of Tuttul, which was a 3-day boat journey from Mari. With this arrangement, Zimri-Lim was considered to be reigning over the kingdom of Mari from Tuttul. His first Year 1 was counted from here, and lasted till his Year 17.
Year 1: when Zimri-Lim seized Kahat [1680 BCE].
Year 2: when Zimri-Lim puts in order Euphrates banks. He erected his statue for Addu of Aleppo [1679 BCE].
Year 3: Zimri-Lim was victorious against Banjaminites in Saggaratum [1678 BCE].
Year 4: Zimri-Lim seized Ashlakka [1677 BCE].

In the early 1679 BCE, the eponym chronicle has an entry:
"During the eponymy of Ashur-taklaku, Shamshi-Adad defeated [...]" 

The lacuna, or missing part, could be the name Yamhad (king Sumu-Epuh). Around this same time Sumu-Epuh died, and his son Yarim-Lim, who had likely already been declared king years before, succeeded to throne of Yamhad.

Yarim-Lim's act of appointing Zimri-Lim as true heir to the throne of Mari and Zimri-Lim's victory over Kahat (1680 BCE) and Saggaratum (1678 BCE) may have prompted Shamshi-Adad to secure the Mariote throne, deciding to go to Mari during the eponymy of Haya-malik [REL 182] to depose and kill Sumu-Yaman and install his own womanizer son, Yashma-Adad (c.1678 BCE), whom he had marry Betlum, the daughter of Ishi-Addu of Qatna -- an enemy of Yamhad. This Ishi-Addu had in the past declared that
 "even if Shamshi-Adad would conclude peace with Sumu-epuh, I will never make peace with Sumu-epuh [1680s BCE], as long as I live!"

Since the days of Amarpiel I, Yamhad had repeatedly reclaimed territory taken by Qatna. Tensions worsened when Ishi-Addu failed to overpower Yamhad in struggle: he seized Parga in Hamath, on Qatna’s border. Qatna, called "Shinar" near Hamath in Isaiah 11:11, was left behind. Sumu-Epuh of Yamhad (d. 1679 BCE) retook Parga, provoking Ishi-Addu’s wrath.

In the south, Ishi-Addu confronted a widespread rebellion. He appealed to Shamshi-Adad, who agreed to send aid.
Shamshi-Adad initially planned to send 20,000 troops under the command of his son Yasmah-Adad (1678), but the plan was abandoned when Yasmah-Adad showed no interest -- as the troops of Zimri-Lim were just few hours distant from him. A significantly smaller force was therefore sent instead, under Assyrian generals who entered Ishi-Addu’s service around 1677 BCE.

The Assyrian troops deliberately avoided engagement with Yamhad and did not take part in the war against it. Meanwhile, Ishi-Addu established himself at Qadesh to oversee the suppression of the revolt, which appears to have received support from Yarim-Lim I. Workers in Hazor were probably complaining to the large quantities of commodities that Ishi-Addu was demanding them for his daughter's dowry when she married Yashma-Adad in Mari.
Shamshi-Adad's military and financial resources were probably exhausted due to several battles: in Assyria against Erishum II, in Mari against Yahdun-Lim, and now he faced the troops of Eshnunna under Dadusha. In Year 2 of Eshnunna's king, Dadusha, equipped with superior military technology, defeated Ekallatum and subdued Ishme-Dagan and, by extension, Shamshi-Adad I (1677 BCE). 

Shamshi-Adad refrained from launching war against Yamhad because his viceroy in Mari, Yasmah-Adad, was weak. Moreover, Saggaratum, which had just fallen to Mari and where Zimri-Lim had another palace, lay only a few hours from Mari itself -- the risk was too great.

1678 BCE

Spies of Zimri-Lim reported that king Asdi-takim of Haran, the kings of Zalmaqum, and the sheikhs (mayors) and elders of the Banjaminites offered a donkey in the temple of the moon-god Sin in Haran to seal an alliance treaty. In response, Zimri-Lim moved against them, defeating them in Saggaratum (1678) -- taking Haran from Shamshi-Adad's hands. 
Then, Ishi-Addu died: in Mari texts he appears in 6 years correspondences. He was succeeded by Amud-pi-el (Amarpiel) II. This may have stirred Amarpiel's resentment, as Shamshi-Adad have not helped his predecessor. 
Because of killing the kings of Banjaminites and ordering the digging of Khabur canal, the Yaminite tribes revolted against Zimri-Lim (1677 BCE). Amarpiel II sent troops to Dur-Yahdun-Lim as a support after Zimri-Lim asked him a help. This battle necessitated Zimri-Lim in his Year 6 to conduct a census of the land (1676-1675 BCE) to assess the lost and strength, and to determine the population of the ten tribes of Hanaeans, and this was followed by rebuilding the Dur-Yahdun-Lim (1675-1674 BCE).
Zimri-Lim sealed his alliance by marrying Dam-hurasim, daughter of Amarpiel II (r. 1677–1663 BCE), and soon may have one daughter to her.
Yarim-Lim I, however, sent a letter to Zimri-Lim telling him that Yarim-Lim will agree to establish peach with Qatna if Amarpiel II were to come by himself to Aleppo, thus acknowledging the supremacy of Yamhad. He further stated: "we will establish good relations between me and him, an oath by the gods and a firm treaty."

During this period, Zimri-Lim was under the guidance of the Kingdom of Yamhad, and was likely residing in different places, such as Alalakh, Tuttul, Saggaratum, and Terqa, and even having 17 year-names to commemorate his achievements every year of his reign while in exile. He twice asked Yarim-Lim to extradite his subordinates. 
The first concerned a vassal king who addressed Zimri-Lim as "brother" rather than "father;" Yarim-Lim refused the demand. The second was made through Daris-Libur, the Mariote ambassador in Aleppo, who requested the return of fugitives.  Yarim-Lim declined twice before finally agreeing on the Mariote ambassador's third approach.


In his fifth regnal year in 1675 BCE, his mother Addu-duri, probably wife of Hadni-Addu (most likely brother of Yahdun-Lim), died; and so, queen Shibtu assumed oversight of certain palace reserves, including metals and wool, which were left by the queen dowager. 
Zimri-Lim, who was under Yarim-Lim was at peace with Amarpiel II, the successor of king Ishi-Addu, which in effect Qatna was at peace with Yarim-Lim I. This could be the reason why Shamshi-Adad ordered his troops back, four years after serving Ishi-Addu of Qatna. 

"In the eponymy of Ibni-Adad," AKL reports, "Shamshi-Adad went up from Karduniash (Babylon). He took Ekallatum" from Yamhad  because it was under Zimri-Lim in Mari king's Year 8 (or 7th year), 1674 BCE. By this regnal year also, Zimri-Lim travelled in Ilansura (Ellasar) by passing Saggaratum, Rasum, and Tadum.

A Mari text, probably written by Hammurabi, gives condition by how Mankisum be taken from Babylon.

"If he releases Mankisum, Upi, Shahadunu, and the banks of the Tigris River three double-miles south of Upi — which is the border my grandfather Apil-Sin fixed - then, I will make peace with him. Otherwise, if I am to release Mankisum, he should repay me (for) my efforts that I expended against the Sukkal of Elam for Mankisum. (Only) then may he take Mankisum and I (will take) Upi, Shahadunu and three double-miles south of Upi (along) the banks of the Tigris River."

This same Mankisum was seized by Dadusha in the Eshnunna king's Year 5, 1674 BCE.

After that, Mari king has received an intelligence that:

"A mass of troops of the prince of Eshnunna are assembling at Mankisum; Dannum-tahaz will cross the river with them and go to Rapiqum."

Around 1673 BCE, during Year 8 of Zimri-Lim’s reign, Amarpiel of Qatna, came to Ugarit and met Zimri-Lim. At this point, Zimri-Lim probably had six daughters with queen Shibtu. 

In 1673-1672 BCE, Siwe-Palar-Khuppak (Sheplarpak) of Elam formed a coalition with Zimri-Lim (r.1680-1663) and Hammurabi of Babylon (r.1696-1654), but Sheplarpak sent armies to attack some settlements loyal to and under the protection of Mari, getting Zimri-Lim angered. Babylon reached out Elam to be allies. Siwe-Palar-Khuppak's plan in that alliance was for Hammurabi to attack Eshnunna with the intention to conquer it and impose direct rule from his sukkal Kudu-zulush in Susa. Besides, he also sent message to Rim-Sin in Larsa of a help. Later, the coalition turned against Siwe-Palar-Khuppak's intention, which is obvious in the title he made for himself "Enlarger of the Empire," and they fought Siwe-palar-huppak and his ally the warlord Atamrum and seiged Razama. 

1672 BCE 

Yarim-Lim convened an assembly of his vassals, and Zimri-Lim traveled to Aleppo where he met the envoys from Qatna and Hazor, indicating that Amarpiel II was now recognizing Yarim-Lim's dominance and that Hazor, vassal of Qatna, had submitted to Yamhad.
According to Mari archives (ZL 10), this occurred in the "Year 10 in which Zimri-Lim went up to Yamhad."

Qarni-Lim of Andarig became an ally of Zimri-Lim after breaking away from a coalition with Eshnunna. However, when Shamshi-Adad campaigned on behalf of his ally Dadusha, Qarni-Lim (r.1676-1672) voluntarily submitted as a vassal to Shamshi-Adad, a betrayal caused a feud with Zimri-Lim resulting in a siege of the city Andarig (1669). Internal revolt destabilizated Qarni-Lim's government -- and he was assassinated by beheading in 1672 BCE.
 Seizing the opportunity, Dadusha's troops occupied Andarig and gave its throne to a populist leader Atamrum, son of Warad-Sin, king of Allahad.  Mari archives record this in ZL 11, the "Year in which Zimri-Lim was victorious against Qarni-Lim," suggesting that the rebellion in Andarig was likely incited by Zimri-Lim between 1672 and 1671 BCE.
Atamrum, king of Allahad and sooner of Andarig, in the 10th regnal year of Zimri-Lim, led an army against Razama, which was ruled by Sharraya (Sharrum-kima-kalima), a vassal of Zimri-Lim. The army was a coalition of Eshnunna (under Dadusha) and Elam (under Siwe-Palar-Huppak). They had a prolonged but ultimately  unsuccessful siege against the city. The defenders were practicing a strategy of active defense "When troops arrived at Razama, when they arrived, the troops of the city came out and killed 700 Elamites and 600 Eshnunakeans". They break the assault, pouring hot bitumen over the attacker's siege towers and burned them. After a siege ramp was constructed it was attacked:

... Citizens made a tunnel in the city. They made two holes in the wall, right and left toward the front of the ramp. At night they entered [that] tunnel, and in the early morning, the troops of the city [came] out and killed half of the troops (of Atamrum). They made them drop the bronze lances and their shields and brought them inside the city."

1671 BCE

Yarim-Lim extended his influence to Ugarit. In Year 11 of Zimri-Lim (1671 BCE), Zimri-Lim made a diplomatic tour to Ugarit. The armies of Yarim-Lim campaigned as far as Elam near the modern southern Iraqi-Iranian borders, most likely because Yasub-Yahad requested Yarim-Lim of military aid, probably as Yashub-Adad, king of Ahazum, was pressuring them, as Shamshi-Adad asking tributes from Ahazum.
Then, Atru-Sipti, the king of Urshu, visited Mariote king in the 12th year of  Zimri-Lim (1669 BCE). At this same time, Dadusha was planning a collaboration with Babylon to attack Diyala region.

"Speak to Yasmah-Addu, thus says Ishme-Dagan your brother. I wrote to you before to say that I had gone to Karana to help Samu-Addu. The ruler of Eshnunna (Dadusha), together with all his troops, his courtiers and his friends, has assembled and is staying in Upe [Damascus] and he kept writing to the ruler of Babylon (Hammurabi) to meet him in Mankisum [Diyala region], but the ruler of Babylon did not agree."

Dadusha was trying to persuade Babylon to join his planned attack on Diyala region, but Hammurabi rejected the proposal, probably, after recognizing Yarim-Lim as more powerful than both Dadusha and minion Ishme-Dagan I (under Shamshi-Adad I). It would also have been strategically risky to allow Assyrians and Eshnunnaeans to devastate the Diyala frontier, leaving Babylon's own territory exposed to hostile powers. Hammurabi might have thought that he, not Malgium or Qabra, would be the next target of an Assyrian-Eshnunna coalition.

Note: Shamas Addu of Karala, the ally of Ishme-Dagan I and mentioned in the letter, was likely the father of ill-Samas (OBTR 317), who became a servant of king Pithana of Kussara during the eponymy of Usur-sa-Ashur in Year 23 of Samsuiluna's reign (1633 BCE). 
 


1669 BCE

YAMHAD IS BETRAYED 

Ishme-Dagan took part in the campaign against Qabra, a fortified city between Erbil and the lower Zab river and was recently devasted by Kakrum. For over ten days, Assyrian forces, 12,216 spearmen, plus 10,000 soldiers, pressed the siege lasting until the city gave way. Following the conquest, Shamshi-Adad planted Turukkean deportees in the area, but they rebelled,  and 4,000 of them were captured and relocated to Ekallatum (1668 BCE); Dadusha has his own version: that he had taken Qabra with 10,000 troops and left garrisons behind.
Within 10 days, Dadusha in his Year 10, together with Shamshi-Adad who was in his Year 27, defeated king Bunu-Ishtar of Qabra. Dadusha beheaded the king and brought the head back to Eshnunna, as what he has written on his stele:

"... I majestically approach Qabra, his main city. In ten days I seized this city by means of a surrounding siege wall, by heaping up earth, with the help of a breach, an attack and my great strength. I swiftly bound its king Bunu-Ishtar by the blaze of my strong weapon and I truly had his head quickly brought to Eshnunna. ..."

According to Limi-Dagan, historian of Shamshi-Adad, this happened during the eponymy of Askudum, 37 years after the eponymy of Puzur-Ishtar [REL 191]. 

At about the same time, Shamshi-Adad advised his young son, Yashma-Adad, on how to rapidly levy troops for the siege of Nurrugum:

“General Yarimaddu told me that he had inspected the Hana (Khana) tribesmen and picked 2000 to go on the campaign with you and their names are noted on a tablet.  Choose for yourself the 2000 Hana who will march with you and the 3000 already picked.  Have Layum and your other advisors hear this tablet and help you decide.  A tally of your men for military service is long overdue and as you can’t do it now, do it on your return.  Until then, replace only deserters, missing and dead.  Conscript 1000 men between the two towns and 1000 Hana, 600 Uprapu, Yarikhu (Jericho) and Amanu.  Round up a further 200 and 300 men wherever you can and make a unit of 500.  You will only need 1000 of your household troops.  Then you will have 10,000 troops.  I will send 10,000 landsmen (Assyrian territorial soldiers) who form a strong and well-equipped contingent.  I have also sent word to Eshnunna (Dadusha) for 6000 men to come up from there.  Together making up 20,000 we have a strong army!”
At the end of the day, Yashma-Adad was not interested in wars, and it was Shamshi-Adad who captured Nurrugum as well as 9 kings, Kibrum, king Yashub-Adad of Ahazum (actually defeated by Ishme-Dagan I), and king Yashub-Lim; and then gave them as booty to Dadusha when the limmu official was Ashur-malik.
Hammurabi's ally, Yarim-Lim reacted with this attack by sending troops in Diyala region.

Heartbroken must have been Yarim-Lim when he learned that Yasub-Yahad of Der and the ruler of Diniktum had likely gone over to Shamshi-Adad I. At that time Shamshi-Adad was only hours away from Der and already occupying Qabra, and had probably even sent part of the loot from Qabra as tribute to Dadusha.

A tablet discovered at Mari revealed the extent of those military interventions of Yarim-Lim in Mesopotamia; the tablet includes a declaration of war (c.1669 BCE) against Der and Diniktum in retaliation for their evil deeds, a reminder to Yasub-Yahad, the king of Der,  about the military help given to his predecessor for 15 years by Yarim-Lim and the stationing of 500 Aleppan warships for 12 years in Diniktum.
What made matters worse was that Shamshi-Adad treacherously betrayed Dadusha and Ibal-piel despite having received their help (an example of help, in 1669 BCE, Ibal-piel joined with Shamshi-Adad to attack the kingdom of Malgium). 
Ibal-piel (1669-1653), newly enthroned king of Eshnunna, offered peace and was fixing the borders, particularly their founded Harradum, to Zimri-Lim by sending envoys to Yarim-Lim asking for authorization which was not given. Because the father-in-law (Yarim-Lim) rejected the peace treaty, Zimri-Lim refused Ibal-piel's treaty on three occasions. Like his father Dadusha, Ibal-piel had a too much inclination to Shamshi-Adad, as probably suspected by Yarim-Lim I.
Ibal-piel was trying to convince Zimri-Lim, who this time was likely in Terqa. Terqa was subdued by Zimri-Lim in Year 12, around 1670 BCE.

"To our lord speak! Your servants Ibal-piel and Buqaqum (say), “We [arrived] in [the city of ] Assur at bedtime and [heard] the following word from those around us: ‘Kakmum defeated Ardigandi, the [king of ] Qabra.’ This we heard from those around us. We arrived [in Ekallatum], and Isme-Dagan [spoke to us] as follows: He (said), ‘5 hundred troops of Gur-gurrum attacked [the land] of Ardigandi and looted [its villages]. Two thousand troops of Ardi-gandi went out to the rescue and fought, and Kakmu went ahead and defeated Ardigandi. And his (Ardigandi’s) high-ranking servants were running about aimlessly. Now that man, from cause of having been defeated, [will]. And he will pay attention to your lord (Zimri-Lim)." --- ARM 26/2

This intelligence was sent when Ibal-piel II was still  friend of Assyria (Shamshi-Adad I) and Ekallatum (Ishme-Dagan I) to inform Zimri-Lim that king Ardi-gandi of Qabra was defeated by Kakmum. Ibal-piel was in effect stirring up the interest of Yarim-Lim via Zimri-Lim because the region was under the Amorite allies of Yamhad.
Accordingly, 20 vassal kings were following Yarim-Lim I (d.1668) -- compared to the 10 or 15 kings that follow Hammurabi the ruler of Babylon, Rim-Sin of Larsa (d.1667), Ibal-pi-el of Eshnunna (started 1669 BCE), and Amarpiel II of Qatanum (ARM XXVI/2: p. 56-59 (text 303: 21’-22’). This explains why Ibal-piel was trying to be at peace with Yamhad Kingdom via Zimri-Lim and why Shamshi-Adad and Hammurabi of Babylon were avoiding Yamhad in direct combat in the past decades. 

The coalition faced another problem: in his regnal Year 28, Shamshi-Adad attacked the then weak Qabra with his ally Dadusha, who was in Year 10. But afterward he turned on Dadusha and then on cities Shaduppum, Nerebtum and Andarig. Yashma-Adad visited Andarig after his father subdued it. And Rapiqum was forcedly taken by Shamshi-Adad from Eshnunna. This raised concern among neighboring countries and compelled Ibal-piel, the successor of Dadusha, to convince Zimri-Lim and Hammurabi of Babylon to take measures for their defense. Zimri-Lim in Year 12 (1669 BCE) went to the help of Andarig. Joining with them were Amarpiel II of Qatna, Yarim-Lim of Yamhad and Rim-Sin of Larsa to oppose Shamshi-Adad in 1668 BCE.
Siwe-Palar-Hupak may have invaded Apum, and his Elamite troops killed its king Haya-Abum (r.1675-1668). 
Yarim-Lim  died, too, and succeeded by his son Hammurabi I. By around this time, queen Shibtu probably gave birth to a boy and girl twins.

1668 BCE

HAMMURABI I, 3rd KING OF YAMHAD 

Hammurabi I (1668-1654) of Yamhad sent troops to support his namesake Hammurabi (1696-1654) of Babylon against an invasion by Siwe-Palar-Hupak of Elam.
The coalition was unstable at the start. Rim-Sin had pledged military aid to Babylon, but he withheld it, refusing to wage war against Siwe-Palar-Khuppak of Elam. At the same time, Anni, governor of Eshnunna, may have encouraged Larsa (Rim-Sin) to revolt against Babylon (1667 BCE).
Meanwhile, Amarpiel II of Qatna tried to form an alliance with the Elamite king. 
An Elamite messenger reached Emar and sent three of his servants to Qatna; Zimri-Lim of Mari intercepted the plot and warned Hammurabi I. Hammurabi I, who that time was the king of Yamhad, sent troops to intercept them on their return. As a result, the Elamite envoys were captured on the borders as they were returning to Elam and questioned, revealing that Amarpiel told them to tell their monarch that "The country is delivered to you, come up to me! if you come up, you will not be taken by surprise."
King Amarpiel II also sent two messengers to Elam, but they were probably captured in Babylon.
Despite the early defections, the alliance held. In the 29th year of Babylonian Hammurabi, troops from Babylon, Mari (Zimri-Lim) and Yamhad defeated the combined forces of Elam and Guti, expelling the Elamite forces from the borders of Assyria, Gutium, and Eshnunna. This is reflected on the report to Zimri-Lim of his general, Ibalpiel:

“To My Lord from Ibalpiel your servant:
Hammurabi said this to me: ‘a heavy armed force went out to attack the enemy column, but no suitable place could be found, so the force returned empty-handed and the enemy column is proceeding in good order without panic.  Now send out a light armed force to raid the column and capture prisoners for interrogation.’  That’s Hammurabi’s orders.  So I am sending Sakirum with 300 troops to Shabazum and the troops I have sent are 150 Hana, 50 Suhu and 100 troops from the Euphrates valley and there are also 300 troops from Babylon.  In the vanguard of My Lord’s troops goes Ilunasir the seer, My Lord’s subject and a Babylonian seer goes with the troops of Babylon.  These 600 troops are based at Shabazum and the seer consults the omens.  When the omens are favourable; 150 go out and 150 come in.  May My Lord [Zimri-Lim] be informed.  My Lord’s troops are well.” 
In this event, 1668 BCE, Babylonian prophet Ilu-nasir helped Babylonian Hammurabi.

1667 BCE

After defeating Elam, Hammurabi of Yamhad sent troops to support Babylonian Hammurabi in his war against Larsa. 
Hammurabi of Babylon then joined forces with Zimri-Lim and marched to Mashkan-shapir, on the northern border of Rim-Sin's city and the forces quickly stepped in Larsa that after six months of siege, they defeated the city. Although Rim-Sin initially escaped, he was captured soon after and died in the captivity in 1666 BCE.

Around this time, Ibal-piel II of Eshnunna was fighting Shamshi-Adad and seized Mahazum in Subartu (IPE 4), and after that Hammurabi attacked the soldiers of Eshnunna (32nd Year name). 

1666 BCE

Then Yamhad (Hammurabi I) dispatched 10,000 soldiers to aid Zimri-Lim. Following this was the retake of Mari, after the death of Shamshi-Adad I.
King Ibal-piel reported that on his Year 5 (1666-1665 BCE), Shamshi-Adad died - this was forty three years after  the eponymy of Puzur-Ishtar (REL 154) or 16 years after Erishum II was deposed from Assyrian throne. According to Assyrian King List:
 
Shamshi-Adad I 

"ruled 33 years and was conquered by Hammurabi," 

which means he reigned 16 years in Ekallatum and 17 years in Assyria. 
This Shamshi-Adad's military defeat was officially reported by Hammurabi, who in his Year 32, wrote:

32 mu ha-am-mu-ra-bi lugal ... 
[Year 32: Hammurabi king ... ]

ugnim eren2 ... 
[the troops and army of...]

su-bir4{ki} ... 
[Suburtu/Assyria ...] 

me3-ta bi2-ib-szub-ba 
[from the battle defeated]
 
...  ma-da gu2 idigna 
[...the land on the bank of Tigris]

en-na zag kur su-bir{ki}-sze3 
[up to the border of the land of Subartu (Assyria)

szu-ni sa2 bi2-in-du11-ga / 
[by his hand made pacified]

ba-an-sig3
[he struck down]."

This corresponds to 1666-1665 BCE in the Ultra-Low Chronology, when Ibal-piel II was in Year 5 at Eshnunna and Hammurabi was in regnal Year 32 in Babylon. 
Few months after Hammurabi defeated the army of Assyria, Shamshi-Adad died.
Shamshi-Adad's death gave way for Zimri-Lim to take back Mari, and that's by the help of Hammurabi I of Yamhad and their tribes surrounding Mari. 
Yashma-Adad, who was sitting on the throne of Mari, has discredited himself both in his father and brother's eyes and among the people of Mari. Beside being weak and inactive, his reign was remembered mainly for his indulgence in women. None of the citizens wanted such a king, encouraging a Bantu-Simaal leader to rise up and to depose Yashma-Adad. 
Zimri-Lim mobilized his forces, including tribal allies such as the Bensimalites and Banjaminites, and filled the power vacuum. By the month Lîliâtum (apparently the 9th month) of that same year he reentered Mari, marking the second beginning of his restoration.

 Second Year-names of Zimri-Lim:

1.Year in which Zimri-Lim ascended the throne of his father (1665 BCE)
2.Year Zimri-Lim made (the statue of) Annunitum of Sehrum (1664 BCE).

His accession happened in  month Liliatum, in the eponymy of Tab-sili-Ashur in 1665-1664 BCE, specifically in the 32nd regnal year of Shamshi-Adad I.
This single year of actual reigning in Mari is inserted among the early years of Zimri-Lim's reign while in exile, which creates confusion for modern historians. Needless to say, Zimri-Lim had two "Year 1" in his life: the first when he became  king/governor of Tuttul (Mariote Kingdom in exile), and the second when he was actually enthroned in Mari.

1665 BCE

 After that, the king of Ugarit wrote to Yamhad king -- asking Hammurabi I to intermediate with Zimri-Lim to let him see the famous Palace of Mari, as he wish (1665 BCE).

Later in the reign of Hammurabi I, the city of Carchemish --- 100 km (62 mi) northeast of Aleppo, Syria --- came under Yamhad's domination.
Zimri-Lim established trade relations with at least 32 kings, mentioned in the palace archives, including those of Andarig, Apum, Ugarit, Byblos, Idamaras, Ilansura (Ellasar), and counts Anum-Herwa of Zalwar, Sharrum-kima-kalima of Razama, Terah from Urkesh, and Arriwuki (Arioch), and Hazorites, Sheth (Sutium/Sodomites), and likely of Jericho (Yarikhu) as his vassals. He also became an ally of Amarpiel II.
Pastoralists complained the burdens they were lefting imposed by Zimri-Lim. 

"All of the nomads gathered, saying this, 'Write to our lord so as to allow us to make a raid on the sheep of Ishme-Dagan in Rapiqum and Yabliya. We want then to turn back toward the Bank of the Euphrates (i.e., Mari), (at which point) we will give many sheep to our lord [Zimri-Lim]. In this way, our lord would not keep on requesting sheep from us.” This is what all the nomads said as in one voice. ..."

Sodomites of Shutu (Sheth) might have also complaining.
These complaints reached queen Shibtu. If this spread out to Assyria, the possible reaction of Ishme-Dagan was to attack Mari in advance. Queen Shibtu received an intelligence report that Ishme-Dagan was indeed planning against Mari.

START OF CONFLICT BETWEEN ZIMRI-LIM AND HAMMURABI 

After the death of Shamshi-Adad in 1666/1665 BCE, a dispute broke out between Zimri-Lim and Hammurabi over the control of Hit (Bitum).

According to a report from Mari’s ambassador in Babylon, Hammurabi made his position clear. The ambassador wrote to Zimri-Lim:

"To my lord say: Thus says your servant. I spoke with Hammurabi about the garrison at Rapiqum. I mentioned: ‘Hit, Kharbe, and Yabliya.’  
He replied: ‘You must not mention Hit [Bitum]!’
He continued: ‘The situation is the same as when Shamshi-Adad took Rapiqum from the king of Eshnunna's control and gave it to me.
My garrison has remained there ever since and must remain now. Just as Shamshi-Adad’s garrison remained there ever since, so Zimri-Lim’s garrison may stay.
Just as our garrisons stayed there together, let our garrisons now be merged as one. A treaty of peace between us must last forever.’"

Hammurabi was referencing an earlier event: Shamshi-Adad had seized Rapiqum from Ibal-piel, the king of Eshnunna who in return happily marked the death of Shamshi-Adad in IPE 5 (Ibal-piel II of Eshnunna, 5th year name).
Hammurabi was signaling to Zimri-Lim: do not contest Hit (Hitum) the way Eshnunna contested Rapiqum (from Ishme-Dagan I). You may have a garrison, but ultimate control stays with Babylon.

Why did Zimri-Lim want Bitum (Hitum) so badly?
Hit (Hitum) was strategically and economically vital. It was the main source of asphalt/bitumen in the region. That resource had military value: Zimri-Lim’s ally Sharraya of Razama used asphalt in 1672 BCE to burn the siege engines of Atamrum, Dadusha, and Siwe-Palar-Huppak during their attack on Razama. This may also suggest that Sutum (Sodom) was starting to reject paying asphalt as tribute to the alliance of Zimri-Lim, which explains why Zimri-Lim now wanted Hitum (Hit) so badly from Hammurabi's control. So from the time Zimri-Lim built a palace in Saggaratum in 1678 BCE, we may infer that the Sodomites were paying tribute to the alliance, but in the 13th year they rebelled. 

For Zimri-Lim there was also a historical claim. In his view, Hit belonged to the old district of Tuttul — the same region Sargon of Akkad (r.2238-2183 BCE) had included together with Mari. Control of Hit would restore a piece of that ancestral territory.

Babylon may have seen Zimri-Lim's restoration to the throne of Mari as a threat. Because even while in exile and ruling Mari from abroad, Zimri-Lim managed to bring many distant cities under the control of his overlord, Yarim-Lim of Yamhad. He is also remembered for the remarkable feat of traveling from his capital to the Mediterranean coast — a round trip of nearly 1,000 miles. For the time, this was an enormous undertaking, as most inhabitants of Mari never left the city, let alone journeyed to the sea. 
He traveled with an entourage of 4,000, including family and household staff. For many, it was their first glimpse of the coast and of foreign cities. Beyond spectacle, the expedition served a political purpose. By stopping in allied towns, he strengthened trade ties and announced dominion as a rising commercial power — a status protected by his overlord in Yamhad. And no one dared to harm them while journeying, as Yamhad was the most powerful kingdom in the region at that time, i .e., neither Shamshi-Adad nor Hammurabi of Babylon dared to fight Yamhad that time.

To know the magnitude of its power, a tablet letter reminded Zimri-Lim (as of 1669 BCE) that, Yarim-Lim could count 20 allied kings — outnumbering the coalition Hammurabi of Babylon, Rim-Sin of Larsa, Ibal-pi-el of Eshnunna, or Amut-pi'el of Qatna had. 
This network of alliances, built during Yarim-Lim I’s reign (c.1680-1668), continued to shape northern Syria even into the reign of his successor Hammurabi I (c.1668-1654 BCE). 

The reach of this diplomacy extended to the Levant. For an instance, the ruler of Byblos, Yantin (fl. 1680-1660), who was appointed by the Egyptian king Neferhotep I (c.1664-1653), recognized Zimri-Lim as a major ruler and maintained diplomatic correspondence with him (1664 BCE).
Zimri-Lim married his daughter Shimatum to Haya-Sumu, ruler of Ilansura (Ellasar). He then married another daughter, Kirum, to the same man and appointed her "hazannu" (mayor or governor) of Ilansura (near modern Tell al-Salihiyah). This appointment was probably requested by Kirum herself to gain Haya-Sumu’s attention, since he favored Shimatum. The rivalry ended in Haya-Sumu’s divorce from Kirum. 

Apparently, Haya-Sumu’s rule did not last long. After Teirru (Terah) left Urkesh because of death threats, Haran died in Urkesh-dim, whereas Abram went to Shekhem (to where Saqqaran Egyptians cursed him in c.1630 BCE), the kingdom of Urkesh probably fell to Ariukki, who may also have conquered Ilansura (Ellasar), which was a 2-day walk from Urkesh, which was on the northern border of Ashnakkum in Idamaraz region. In the Mari archives, king "Arriwuki" appears as a subordinate of Zimri-Lim (r.1679–1663 BCE). Since Terah was a second degree subordinate of Zimri-Lim, Ariukki — a Hurrian ruler approved by Zimri-Lim to replace Terah — would have shared the same status if he became king of Urkesh. Most likely Ariukki would only touch Ilansura or Urkesh after Zimri-Lim was deposed from Mari.
Inibsharri, yet another daughter of Zimri-Lim, having reached marriageable age, was given in marriage to a newly subjugated vassal king or well-known official Bahdi-Lim. By then, at least three or four of Zimri-Lim’s daughters were over 10 years old.
Terah (Teirru), the vassal ruler of Urkesh under the rule of Ashnakkum (44bis:16), sent several letters to Zimri-Lim explaining why he needed to leave Urkash-dim (sons of Urkesh): the Hurrians and Habiru (Hebrews) there were making many death threats against him and were slandering him -- "lemnētim idabbubū" (“they speak evil things”) of him -- after he accepted Zimri-Lim as overlord. It seems that this was not the case when Yashma-Adad (1669 BCE) was the suzerain of Idamaras. The sons of Urkesh abhorred Terah for choosing Zimri-Lim. They considered him "nakrū" ("to be enemy"), and also "izērū" (“they hate”) him. And this was understandable because Urkesh-dim was much nearer to Shamshi-Adad's seat of power (Shubat Enlil, about 130 km away) than to Zimri-Lim's Alalakh or Mari (470 km distant). That is, Shamshi-Adad could reach Urkesh in just a few hours, whereas Zimri-Lim would take a few days. Hence, the sons of Urkesh were furious at Terah for siding with Zimri-Lim.
Terah (Te-er-ru) called his citizens as 

"DUMU.MEŠ a-li-ia,"
" 'dim'  of my city" (44bis:8),

where "dim" means "sons." It was he who probably popularized "Urkash-dim." 
The name "Urkesh" was usually used to  mean the inhabitants, or as a collective, with the plural verb "ilqu" -- by their neighborhood Ashlakka (48:59) and Ashnakkum (98:17). Abram used the term "Urkash-dim," instead.
This may mean Terru (Terah) was not native to Urkesh like the Hurrians, because he was an Amorite, as was Zimri-Lim.

Terah said:

“Because I have cast my lot with my lord [Zimri-Lim], people in my town hate me. A couple of times I have had to save myself, escaping death”
 (ARM 28 44bis).

And he continued:

 "ittīya ul idabbubū" ("they do not speak with me" -- 107:7)

“I did not know," Zimri-Lim replied, "that the sons of your city hate you on my account. But you are mine, even if the city of Urkesh is not.” (c.1667 BCE)

He probably left Urkesh to Haziran (Haran), who was visited by Zimri-Lim in Ashlakka (c.1669 BCE) to detain several men to Urkesh, where the assembly of Urkesh agreed to free the detainees (69:4). 
Haran died in Urkash-dim, although Abram continued the journey, while Terah probably remained in Harran.
Zimri-Lim was a good reader, and he read a lot of letters, not only of his vassals and servants, but most especially of his wife.

In one notable letter from around 1665 BCE, queen Shibtu relayed prophetic omens and intelligence about enemy auxiliaries plotting rebellion to her husband, king Zimri-Lim.

After receiving an oracle from a "qadishtu" (priestess) residing in the temple of Annunitum, the goddess of war, in Sehrum, Shibtu sent a letter to Zimri-Lim. In it, she conveyed the prophetic assurance, saying:

 "I have asked my questions about Babylon. That man [Hammurabi] is plotting many things against this country [Mari], but he will not succeed. My lord [Zimri-Lim] will see what the god will do to him. You will capture and overpower him. His days are numbered and he will not live long. My lord should know."

The content appears to be Shibtu's interpretation of what was actually said — and worse, her mishearing may have led her to improve it into better news for Zimri-Lim. Her line "his days are numbered" suggests that it was likely taken by the priestess from an astrological reading issued by the Babylonian astrologers.

“If an eclipse occurs on the 14th day of Shabatu [month XI], and the god, in his eclipse, becomes dark on the side south above, and clears on the side east below; the north wind (blows, and) (the moon) begins the last watch, and he (the moon) is seen with the sun. His horns bend (toward) the sky. He (the moon) did not obscure (cover up) his entire šurinnu [eclipsing crescent], and disappeared. You observe on the 28th, and the eclipse is near; begins and becomes red; it (the šurinnu) will show you the eclipse. Observe his eclipse, (that of) the god who in his eclipse was visible and disappeared, and bear in mind the north wind. The prediction is given for Babylon: the destruction of Babylon is near.” - EAE tablet 20

A hasty reading or hearing of the final sentence risks misinterpretation. The omen states that if lunar and solar eclipses are observed on the 14th and 28th days of Shabatu, one should "bear in mind the north wind," because it portends that "the destruction of Babylon is near."  
Crucially, the text does not assert that Babylon will fall at the time of the eclipses. The qualifier "NEAR" is indefinite and could refer to a span of two years, a decade, or a generation.



Shibtu also forwarded prophecies promising military success for Zimri-Lim, especially during tensions with Ishme-Dagan (r. 1665–1653 BCE), Shamshi-Adad I’s successor. In one letter, she relayed a favorable oracle from the priests:  
"Dagan, Adad, Itur-Mer, and Belet-ekallim march beside you, and Adad will decide the outcome."

She then reported a vision of rebellion in Ishme-Dagan’s army that would lead to his defeat:

"They will behead Ishme-Dagan and place his head beneath my lord’s feet."

These messages served a dual purpose: they reassured Zimri-Lim of divine backing and demonstrated Shibtu’s active role in gathering prophetic support for Mari’s campaigns.
The solution of Hammurabi for the given date in the prediction (EAE 20) was to standardize the calendar. The trick he used was by adopting Nippur's calendar. 

The first month of the civil calendar during the Ur III and Old Babylonian periods was Sekinku (Addaru), or the "month of barley harvesting" (last half of May and first half of June). In Nippur, however, this same month, called "Segurku" (barley harvesting), was the 12th month. To make it more mind disturbing, Hammurabi designated "Addaru" as the 12th month, thereby Nisannu must be the first month. Furthermore, in Mari, within the realm of Zimri-Lim, barley harvesting occurred in Nisannu (March/April). Before the Babylonian king conquered Larsa in his Year 31 (1666 BCE), Larsa's Nisannu was late by almost one month, falling between April/May, which placed Shabattu in February/March. Thus, Hammurabi had twofold purpose in standardizing calendar in 1665 BCE: first, to obscure the predicted 14th & 28th day of Shabattu, and second, to impose a single calendar on the entire empire. 
As a result, it became difficult now to determine which 14th and 28th day of Shabattu the prediction referred to. But since the original Addaru was the month of harvesting barley (May/June), the original Shabatu must have been in April/May. Therefore, contemporary decoders would have had to look for dual eclipses in April.

Here come the Babylonians, marching toward Mari. The people were given the chance to abandon Zimri-Lim. Hence, around that time, when Hammurabi was in Assyria, Abram — after receiving a message from Yah to leave his birthplace Haran — migrated to Canaan.
The royal citizens of Mari had already fled, too, even before Hammurabi entered Mari. Queen Shibtu was probably left in Mari together with her servants and other officials. That is why the Babylonian king reported in Year 33:

"Hammurabi [of Babylon]... overthrew in battle the army of Mari and Malgium and caused Mari and its territory and the various cities of Subartu [Assyria] to dwell under his authority in friendship." — 1663/1664 BCE

It's possible that Hammurabi I of Yamhad negotiated with Hammurabi of Babylon for the safe passage of his sister, Queen Shibtu. This makes sense, as Babylonian records show that Hammurabi of Babylon does not touch Yamhad/Aleppo in Year 33.

Likewise, some cities under Ishme-Dagan did not dare to fight, and instead reached out for friendship.

However, in 1663 BCE, Zimri-Lim and a few loyal officials may have fled to Alakhtum (Alalakh), his former place of refuge. They likely still trusted the oracle relayed by Queen Shibtu, not realizing she may have altered its meaning. 

That very palace at Alakhtum could be why Hammurabi I of Yamhad suspected Zimri-Lim of ambitions to claim the throne of Yamhad itself in the future — or worse, to betray Yamhad.

Alakhtum (Alalakh) had originally been a fief: a temporary grant of refuge to Zimri-Lim while he was hiding from Shamshi-Adad. Once Zimri-Lim regained his own throne at Mari, he was expected to cede it back to the king of Aleppo, as Ambassador Nur-Sin requested. 

But Zimri-Lim did not return it to Hammurabi I of Yamhad. By holding it, he effectively acted like a vice-king of Yamhad. 

That this was the intended function of Alalakh is confirmed 27 years later, when it became a cadet branch of the Yamhad dynasty: its king was required to remain loyal to Aleppo or forfeit the city. It appears Zimri-Lim was treating Alalakh the same way, and Hammurabi I may have feared he intended to use it as a base to become overlord of Yamhad.

For that reason, Yamhad may have allowed Babylon to destroy it in 1663 BCE, ensuring Zimri-Lim could not establish a rival kingdom there. This would also account for the burning of Palace Level VII at Alalakh. Hammurabi’s army likely set fire to the palace at Alakhtum that same year.
Neither Zimri-Lim's allies in Sodom (Sutum), Hazor and Jericho could help, when Bera led a rebellion against Amarpel, and Abram defeated the alliance of Arriuki. The leader of the district, Kedorlaomer, asked a help from Amarpel, the overlord of the region assisted by Ariukki, the vassal of Zimri-Lim, in 1664 BCE and they may have defeated the Refaim, the Shasu of Aamu, the Yamimu, Kharu, Amalekites, Amorites and Sodomites, but Abram intervened and in return pushed the alliance of Tidhal of Goiim (Galilee), Amarpiel of Shinar, and Ariukki of Ilansura away and slaughtered Kedorlaomer of Eram. So, this time, no way for Zimri-Lim to win the battle against Babylon as his allies in the south were defeated by the  Canaan's Habiru and Hattians led by Abram.
With no refuge left, Zimri-Lim’s troops may have withdrawn to Mari to make a final stand, clinging to the hope that Shibtu’s prophecy would prove true. 

Babylonian records confirm that in Year 35 of Hammurabi, 1662-1661 BCE, 'the walls of Mari were destroyed to the ground.'
Bera's allies, who were formerly under Kedorlaomer, who was under Amarpiel, who was an ally of Zimri-Lim became friends of Babylon as implied in Hammurabi's Year Name 33:

"Hammurabi [of Babylon]... caused Mari and its territory ... to dwell under his authority in friendship." 

Supporting this theory is the fact that Sutium (Sheth/Sodomites) were utilized as couriers by Hammurabi of Babylon, probably a year after Bera succeeded Hammi-Talu. Some of these Sutium camped near Terqa, blocking the roads to Eshnunna.

After this, there are no further mentions of Zimri-Lim. Meanwhile, Hammurabi I of Yamhad remained secure and prosperous, untouched by Babylonian expansion. Friendly relations between Yamhad and Babylon continued into the reigns of their successors. 

On his part, Hammurabi I granted the city of Irridu to his son Yarim-Lim (who probably was at age of 20). He died c. 1654 BCE -- likely around the time Samsuiluna was enthroned -- and he was succeeded by his son Abba-el I. Another son, Nakkusse, is attested in the Alalakh tablets as holding a senior position in the court.

23 September, 2023

ARAB ARABIA ARABAH


SAUDI ARABIA: the phrase "Saudi Arabia" was officially invented on 23 September AD 1932 by its founder, Abdulaziz bin Saud after founding the al-Mamlakah al-ʿArabīyah as-Saʿūdīyah (a transliteration of المملكة العربية السعودية in Arabic, of "the Saudi Arab kingdom"). The root word "as-Sa'udiyah" is derived from the "Al Saud" ("family of Saud"), whose ancestor was Saud ibn Muhammad ibn Muqrin, the father of Muhammad bin Saud (AD 1687–1765), the founder of the First Saudi State and Saudi Dynasty.
Needless to say, Saudi is not the biblical "Arabia."

The biblical "Arabia" is described by the Bible, as for an instance by the apostle Paul, to be located south or below Jerusalem, which means the biblical Arabia was near Jerusalem. Apostle Paul knew this because he lived 3 years in Arabia.

"Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. 
Then after 3 years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him 15 days." -Galatians 1:17-18

Hagar, the Egyptian bondwoman of Sarah, lived in Arabia, particularly in the area of Makhtesh Ramon (Sinai) identified to be the land of Midian in Seir, making her grandchildren, from her son Ishmael, Midianites (Gen 21:14,21 & 37:28). 

"Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the Mt. Sinai, which genders to bondage, which is Agar. 
For this Agar is Mt. Sinai in Arabia, and answers to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But 

Jerusalem which is 

above 

is free, which is the mother of us all." -Galatians 4:24-26

In this allegory, Mt. Sinai in Arabia is in bondage, whereas Jerusalem above it is in freedom. Mt. Sinai as Hagar is mother of bondage, whereas Jerusalem is the mother of freedom.


In other cases, latter at the Babylonian Captivity, the term " מַעֲרָב " (maarab) is used in 1Chronicles 7:28, 12:16, 26:16,18,30 to mean "west," exactly to the direction of Arab in Negeb or south of Judah. 
But Joshua 8:9 uses that word "maarab" to mean "ambush" (Judges 9:35). A place with the name "Arab" is mentioned by Joshua to be located between Hebron and Beersheba. This is the first time that the word "Arab" was used as a toponym.


"Arab, and Dumah, and Eshean, And Janum, and Bethtappuah, and Aphekah, And Humtah, and Kirjatharba, which is Hebron, and Zior; nine cities with their villages" -Joshua 15:52-54

Arab in this passage is understood as "ambush." Although it is located south of Jerusalem and could be belonged to Seir (cf. Deut 1:44), but it was used as a descriptive for Kenite Midianites to mean "mixed people," whose ancestral territories were in Negeb, i.e. south of Judah. It was Moses who first used "Arab" to mean "mixed people" in their exodus in 1229 BCE which the Egyptians, particularly Ipuwer, called "desert people."

"And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about 600 elef strong foot-persons, beside children. And a 

רַ֖ב
[multitude]

עֵ֥רֶב
[‘êrebh/Arab]
mixed 

went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle." -Exodus 12:37-38
 
It is Moses also who revealed that the mixed people with them were the family of Kenite Jethro, priest of Midianites (Num 10:29-31, Judg 1:16). 
In 1Kings 10:15 the same term "'erebh" ("Arabh") is used for "Arabia" as indicated by its "kings" but can be also understood as "mixed countries."

"Beside that he had of the merchantmen, and of the traffick of the spice merchants, and of all the 

kings of Arabia, 

and of the governors of the land." -1Kings 10:15

Arabia referring to a place and not a people is a Hellenized form of "Arabah," an area near Negeb which during the reign of Jehoshaphat was referring to the east of the Philistine land (2Chronicles 17:11) near Kush (Makhtesh Ramon) in the south of Judah, hence both Philistines and Arabs were under the dominion of the king of Judah.

"Moreover YHWH stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines, 

וְהָ֣עַרְבִ֔ים
[wə-hā-‘ar·ḇîm]
and of the Arabs, 


that were near the 

כּוּשִֽׁים
[Kushim]
Kushites" 

-2Chronicles 21:16

As being part of Judah's politics, the Philistines, Arabians, and Kushites [Makhtesh Ramon] from the south of Jerusalem killed the sons of Jehoram (Joram), save the youngest Jehoahaz. The same had happened when Arabs killed all Jehoahaz's sons except the youngest Ahaziah (Ochaziah) in 841 BCE.


"And the inhabitants of Jerusalem made Ahaziah his youngest son king in his stead: for the band of men that came with the Arabians to the camp had slain all the eldest. So Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah reigned." -2Chronicles 22:1

Arabs this time were distinct group of people to the east of Philistine land and Kush (Makhtesh Ramon) in the south of Judah (Jerusalem). 
Arabians were much concerned about the Jerusalem because they were affected if Jerusalemites were strong as they were obligated to pay tributes under its king.

"And the fear of YHWH fell upon all the kingdoms of the lands that were 

round about Judah, 

so that they made no war against Jehoshaphat. Also some of the Philistines brought Jehoshaphat presents, and tribute silver; and the 

Arabians 

brought him flocks, 7700 rams, and 7700 he-goats. And Jehoshaphat waxed great exceedingly; and he built in Judah castles, and cities of store." -2Chronicles 17:10-12

In this passage, Arabians were near Jerusalem the way Philistines were near to the capital city.
Arabians dwelt in Gur-Baal ('Ascend of Baal') near Maon (of Mehunim) and Philistine land.


"And he went forth and warred against the Philistines, and broke down the wall of Gath, and the wall of Jabneh, and the wall of Ashdod, and built cities about Ashdod, and among the Philistines. And God helped him against the Philistines, and against the 

Arabians that dwelt in Gurbaal, 

and the Mehunims. 

And the Ammonites gave gifts to Uzziah: and his name spread abroad even to the 

entering in of Egypt; 

for he strengthened himself exceedingly. Moreover Uzziah built towers in 

Jerusalem 

at the corner gate, and at the valley gate, and at the turning of the wall, and fortified them." -2Chronicles 26:6-9

Arab was near Philistine land and Maon (Tell Ma'in) of Mehunim.

"Arab, and Dumah, and Eshean, And Humtah, and Kirjatharba, which is Hebron, and Zior; nine cities with their villages: 

Maon, 

Carmel, and Ziph, and Juttah," -Joshua 15:52,54-55


Fortifying Jerusalem was a disgusting thing for the Arabians, Philistines (Ashdodites), and Ammonites of the border of Egypt.

"But it came to pass, that when Sanballat, and Tobiah, and the 

Arbim [Arabians], 

and the Ammonites, and the Ashdodites, heard that the walls of 

Jerusalem 

were made up, and that the breaches began to be stopped, then they were very wroth, 
And conspired all of them together to come and to fight against Jerusalem, and to hinder it." -Nehemiah 4:7-8

These "Ammoni" ("Ammonites") are probably distinguished from "Bene-Ammon" ("sons of Ammon") in 2Chronicles 20:1 as the latter are related and relatives of Bene-Mowab ("sons of Moab").

The name Arbayim (Arabians) is clarified by defining it "Arbim" ("Arabs") in 2Chronicles 26:7.


 "And God helped him against the Philistines, and against 

הערביים
[hā-‘Arḇîyîm]
the Arabians 

הָֽעַרְבִ֛ים
[hā-‘Arḇîm]
the Arabs

that dwelt in 


Gur-Baal [Ascend of Baal], and the Mehunims [Maonites]." -2Chronicles 26:7


It seems that the term "Arabiy" ("Arabians ") was used as a variant name for business traders of Midian during the time of prophet Isaiah hence when these business men saw opportunities in the desert west of Babylon, they transferred themselves bringing the name "Arabians" and "Midian" in the east. The Midianites, particularly Ishmaelites, had business trips to and fro in Gilead to Egypt as early as the time of Joseph (Gen 37:25,28). In Moses' exodus, Midian had senators in Moab (Num 22:4,7) for they were in confederation under the suzerainty of Sihon (Num 31:8, Josh 13:21). In Jerubaal's time, Midianites were in Ephraim (Judg 7:25 & 8:3). This gives us an idea that Midianites were scattering to all directions from Kushan (Makhtesh Ramon). In south of Judah they were known "Arbim" (Arabs), whereas in the eastern part of Jordan they were identified with the name Arabiy or Arabiyim (Arabians).

We have a high certainty that the word "Arabh" was derived from "'Erebh" as hinted by prophet Jeremiah.


"And all the kings of 

עֲרָ֑ב
[‘ă·rāḇ]
Arabia, 


and all the kings of 

הָעֶ֔רֶב
[hā-‘e·reḇ]
the mingled people 


that dwell in the desert" -Jeremiah 25:24




Just a century after Babylonian Captivity, the term "Arabian" was used as distant as to Wadi Tumilat of Egypt. Herodotus 2.158 reported that "Patoumos (Pithom was) a city in the Arabian nome." It was the 20th district of Northern Egypt and its capital was Goshen (Egyptian, "Ḳosen"). 

The masculine of Arabah used in Isaiah 21:13 and Ezekiel 27:21 is 


' rabh,


which literally means "desert plain," and translated into "Arabia." 

From 'arabh is derived the adjectival noun

‘ărāḇhî


in Jeremiah 3:2 understood as desert dwellers of south of Judah.

This similar 'Arabhi is referring to the desert dwellers near Babylon in the days of prophet Isaiah (13:19-20).

The Arabia in apostle Paul's epistle is referring to the Arabia Petrea, in the south of Judah to eastern in Jordan. The capital city was Petra, where Imru' al-Qays ibn 'Amr  received the title "King of all the Arabs" in the AD 328 Arabic inscription using Nabatean Aramaic alphabet. Arabs were widespread in the Egyptian peninsula from Petra to Wadi Tumilat in Egypt.
Roman emperor Hadrian (r. AD 117–138) had a map locating 

Arabes Nabataei 

in the desert regions, which were conquered by the Romans on March 22, AD 106 and renamed it Arabia Petraea and annexed as a Roman province. The Mafkat Peninsula became part of Arabia Petraea, a Roman province and now much known by the name Sinai Peninsula.

The Nabatean capital city was Raqmu ( 𐢛𐢚𐢒‎ or 𐢛𐢚𐢓𐢈‎,  rqm or rqmw,  *Raqēmō in Nabatean) which is Petra, taught to be derived from the name of its ancient ruler, Rekem. Josephus mentions that the Arabs in the first century were calling Petra as Rekeme after the name of its royal founder and describes it to be the "highest in the land of the Arabs" (Antiquities iv. 7, 1; 4, 7). 

One of the kings of Midian, namely Rekhem, managed to reign in Rekem during the time of Balaam son of Beor, whose hideout in Deir 'Alla was destroyed in circa 1189 BCE when Tausert was the pharaoh.

"And they warred against the Midianites, as YHWH commanded Moses; and they slew all the males. And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely, Evi, and 

Rekem, 

and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: also Balaam ben-Beor they slew with the sword. And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire." -Numbers 31:7-8,10

Rekem was a Midianite king allied to Moab under the rulership of Sihon.

 Lead by Phinehas, the grandson of Aaron, as the priest and Joshua as chief of staff of Moses, Israelites defeated the Moabite Midianites and even killed Rekem. 
As early as 1206 BCE, Shasu of Edom were used by king Merneptah as messengers and permitted to refresh their animals in Wadi Tumilat. This simply means that Edomites were an ally of the pharaoh and expected to be hostile against Israel. This also may explain why later Wadi Tumilat became an Arabian nome or the 20th district of the Northern Egypt as Midianites or Arabians of south Judah had amalgamated with or even had replaced Edomites.
The term Arabs or Arabians was not in used in the days of Joshua, but when these desert people was mentioned again, they were giving tributes to king Solomon, particularly the gold stationed in Ophir (Makhtesh Ramon) taken probably from Qurayya. This was in connection to the fact that the Kenite Midianites, under Moses' leadership with the Caphtorim (Philistine ancestors) afterwards under Joshua, dominated the Hejaz of Qurayya during the time of king Rameses II and Ramesses III by trading Atika to Hejaz. The troops of Moses, including Kenite Midianites, had transferred from Hormah (Tel Masos) to Edom (Timna Valley) and to Punon, hence Iron Age (1200 BCE) pottery bowls of Negev (south Judah) resembled Edomite and Philistine pottery in their decoration which also resembling Qurayya ware (aliased Midianite pottery). It was because of the gold, copper and business why Kenite Midianites under Israel became connected to Qurayya. 
This gives us insight why Arabs were obligated to pay tributes to king Solomon after David conquered many cities in Edom.

"Beside that which chapmen and merchants brought. And all the kings of 

Arabia 

and governors of the land brought gold and silver to Solomon. And he reigned over all the kings from the river even unto the land of the Philistines, and to the border of Egypt." -2Chronicles 9:14,26

In Eratosthenes' opinions Arabia Felix was lying in the southern of Coele-Syria, hence the ocean to its north was called "Atlantic sea" (Mediterranean ocean). When the term Arabia became extended in area, it was identified to be the length between Heroopolis to Nabataean Petra to Babylon. Thus, the biblical definition from Arab near Beersheba to Babylon was further stretched out by the Roman writers toward Wadi Tumilat, because the latter became the part of the 20th nome of northern Egypt corresponding to the Arabian nome. Before the 1st century, the term "Arabia" was designated to the region lying between the Nile and Red Sea (Aqaba Sea), as noted in Herodotus 2.8 and Strabo 17.1.34.
For this reason, the subcontinent between Delta (Egypt) and Petra became known Arabia, prominently when Mafkat Peninsula was included in Arabia Petraea in AD 106. With this incorporation, Jebel Musa - one of the Mafkat mountains -became more popular as Mountain of Moses. Inscriptions discovered there suggest that between 2nd and 3rd century, Nabataeans were the pilgrims of the region where Jabal Musa is belonged. Celebrity monks were residing in a church in one of the high mountains there that has cave, claiming that their residential area is site where Moses received the Ten Commandments - as on the foot of that mountain was a tree of bush (a monastery was probably built there by Elena, the mother of emperor Constantine). The mountain was so holy that none of the monks or priests who lived nearby were permitted to live on its summit. The inhabitants were identified Arabians and celebrating feasts for the moon, which may have also additional basis why the area was called Sina, whose etymology was "Sin," the ancient moon god, which in more ancient Egyptian rite was called "Yah," exactly homophonous to the Hebrew God's name "Yah."
  Egeria (Etheria), likely a Spanish nun, took a pilgrimage in Egypt to visit the Mountain of Moses. In around AD 383 she reached Jebel Musa. 

 “The mountains,” she writes in a diary, “are ascended with infinite toil” because they could not rise with donkeys but rather they had to “climb straight up the whole way, as if up a wall.” 
 

According to Antoninus Martyr (c.570 AD), Arabian heathens were still celebrating moon feasts on Jebel Musa. This practice was reduced or eliminated when the Byzantine emperor, Justinian I (AD 527-565), order the building of a monastery in the claimed Moses' burning bush site near Jabal Musa. Even Muhammad PBUH, the prophet of Islam, recognized it as the holy mountain, that he recited it in Qur'an 23:20, and identified Jebel Musa as Ṭūr Sīnā’ (Mt. Sinai). This gives us clue that the Arabia known to the 1st century and 7th century people, Christians or non-Christians, was what constituted to the subcontinent between Egypt proper and Nabatæan Petra. The entire subcontinent is now known Sinai Peninsula. Sinai during those two millennia was not known to be in Saudi but in Arabia of Sinai Peninsula.
This may give us hint that after apostle Paul, Sinai in Makhtesh Ramon was apparently, completely eaten by the earth there, leaving no trace of the mountain range, hence making Jews to find it in another location, that is, in Jebel Musa. The earliest inhabitants of the surrounding of Jebel Musa were Monitu, and their area was called Khetiu-Mafkat (ḫtiw-mfkꜣt, "Ladders of the Green Minerals") or ta mafkat (t3 mfk3.t, "land of turquoise") or Biau (bỉꜣw, "Mining Country").

The description that Arabia was between Nile and Nabatæan Petra was clear in some passages of Strabo.

"I return to the opinions of Eratosthenes, which he next delivers respecting Arabia. He is speaking of the 

northern 

and desert part, lying between Arabia Felix, Cœle-Syria, and Judæa, to the recess of the Arabian [Aqaba] Gulf.

From Heroopolis, situated in that recess of the Arabian [Suez] Gulf which is on the side of the Nile, to Babylon, towards Petra of the Nabatæi, are 5600 stadia. The whole tract lies in the direction of the summer solstice (i. e. east and west), and passes through the adjacent Arabian tribes, namely Nabatæi, Chaulotæi, and Agræi. Above these people is Arabia Felix, stretching out 12,000 stadia towards the south to the Atlantic Sea.

The first people, next after the Syrians and Jews, who occupy this country are husbandmen. These people are succeeded by a barren and sandy tract, producing a few palms, the acanthus, and tamarisk; water is obtained by digging [wells] as in Gedrosia. It is inhabited by Arabian Scenitæ, who breed camels. 
...
Merchants arrive in seventy days at Minæa from Ælana. Ælana [Aileı́m] is a city on the other recess of the Arabian Gulf, which is called 

Ælanites, opposite to Gaza,...


...

After the bay is the island Ophiodes, so called from the accidental circumstance [of its having once been infested with serpents]. It was cleared of the serpents by the king, on account of the destruction occasioned by those noxious animals to the persons who frequented the island, and on account of the topazes found there. The topaz is a transparent stone, sparkling with a golden lustre, which however is not easy to be distinguished in the day-time, on account of the brightness of the surrounding light, but at night the stones are visible to those who collect them. The collectors place a vessel over the spot [where the topazes are seen] as a mark, and dig them up in the day. A body of men was appointed and maintained by the kings of Egypt to guard the place where these stones were found, and to superintend the collection of them.

...

Next is the island of Phocæ (Seals), which has its name from those animals, which abound there. Near it is a promontory, which extends towards Petra, of the Arabians called Nabatæi, and to the country of Palestine, to this [island] the Minæi, Gerrhæi, and all the neighbouring nations repair with loads of aromatics.


Next is the Ælanitic Gulf and Nabatæa, a country well peopled, and abounding in cattle. 

... 
Near these people is a nation more civilized, who inhabit a district with a more temperate climate ; for it is well watered, and has frequent showers. Fossil gold is found there, not in the form of dust, but in lumps, which do not require much purification. The least pieces are of the size of a nut, the middle size of a medlar, the largest of a walnut. These are pierced and arranged alternately with transparent stones strung on threads and formed into collars. They are worn round the neck and wrists. They sell the gold to their neighbours at a cheap rate, exchanging it for three times the quantity of brass, and double the quantity of iron, through ignorance of the mode of working the gold, and the scarcity of the commodities received in exchange, which are more necessary for the purposes of life. 


...

The Nabatæans and Sabæans, situated above Syria, are the first people who occupy Arabia Felix. They were frequently in the habit of overrunning this country before the Romans became masters of it, but at present both they and the Syrians are subject to the Romans.

The capital of the Nabatæans is called Petra. It is situated on a spot which is surrounded and fortified by a smooth and level rock (petra), which externally is abrupt and precipitous, but within there are abundant springs of water both for domestic purposes and for watering gardens. Beyond the enclosure the country is for the most part a desert, particularly towards Judæa. Through this is the shortest road to Jericho, a journey of three or four days, and five days to the Phœnicon (or palm plantation). It is always governed by a king of the royal race. The king has a minister who is one of the Companions, and is called Brother. It has excellent laws for the administration of public affairs.

...
...

Merchandise is conveyed from Leuce-Come to Petra, thence to Rhinocolura in Phœnicia, near Egypt, and thence to other nations. But at present the greater part is transported by the Nile to Alexandreia. It is brought down from Arabia and India to Myus Hormus, it is then conveyed on camels to Coptus of the Thebais, situated on a canal of the Nile, and to Alexandreia. 
..." -Strabo 16.4

08 September, 2023

EXODUS' TOPONYMS



Moses mentioned a lot of geographical names or toponyms and instances from the 13th-12th centuries BCE Egyptian timeline. Direct and indirect pieces of evidence of his reports, historical materials, and circumstances bracket the date of Israelite exodus to the 13th century BCE.
In his following report we can get many details that no other copies of the 14th or 15th century BCE can be ascribed as their circumstances:


Numbers 33:2-44

"And Moses wrote their exodus according to their journeys by the commandment of YHWH: and these are their journeys according to their goings out: They left 

Rameses 

on the 15th day of the 1st month; on the day after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand in the sight of all the Egyptians. For the Egyptians buried all their 

firstborn, 

which YHWH had smitten among them: upon their 

gods 

also YHWH executed judgments. 
And the children of Israel removed from Rameses, and camped at 

Succoth. 

And they left Succoth, and camped at Etham, which is in the edge of the wilderness. 
And they left Etham, and turned again unto Pihahiroth, on front of

Baalzephon: 

and they camped on front of Migdol. From the front of Pihahiroth they moved, and passed through the midst of the 

yam [sea] 

into the wilderness, and went 3 days' journey in the 

wilderness of Etham, 

and camped at Marah, and then came unto Elim: and in Elim were 12 fountains of water, and 70 palm trees; and they camped there. 
And they left Elim, and encamped by a sea of reeds. Then they moved from a sea of reeds, and encamped in the 

wilderness of Sin. 

And they took their journey out of the wilderness of Sin, and encamped in Dophkah, and then encamped in Alush, and then from there they encamped at 

Rephidim, 

where was no water for the people to drink. And they left Rephidim, and camped at the 

wilderness of Sinai. 

And they removed from the desert of Sinai, and camped at Kibrothhattaavah, and then encamped at 

Hazeroth. 

And they left Hazeroth, and pitched in Rithmah. They left Rithmah, and pitched at Rimmon-parez. And they departed from Rimmon-parez, and camped at Libnah, then they left Libnah, and pitched at Rissah. And they journeyed from Rissah, and pitched in Kehelathah. They went from Kehelathah, and pitched in Mt. Shapher [Tophel?]. And they removed from Mt. Shapher, and encamped in Haradah. They left Haradah, and pitched in Makheloth. And they removed from Makheloth, and encamped at Tahath. 
They left Tahath, and pitched at Tarah. They removed from Tarah, and  camped at 

Mithcah. 

And they went from Mithcah, and pitched in Hashmonah [Azmon?]. They left Hashmonah, and encamped at Moseroth. They departed from Moseroth [Moserah "Bond"], and pitched in Benejaakan  [sons of Jaacan], and then encamped at Hor-ha-gidgad. 
And they went from Hor-hagidgad, and camped at Jotbathah. They left Jotbathah, and encamped at Abronah. They departed from Ebronah [Passage], and encamped at Eziongaber. And they removed from Eziongaber, and camped at the 

wilderness of Zin, which is Kadesh. 

They left Kadesh, and pitched in Mt. Hor, in the 

edge of the land of Edom.
 
And Aaron the priest went up into Mt. Hor at the commandment of YHWH, and died there, in the 40th year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the 1st day of the 5th month. 
And Aaron was 123 years old when he died in Mt. Hor. 
And the Canaanite king of Arad, who dwelt in the Negeb in the land of Canaan, heard of the coming of the children of Israel. 
They left Mt. Hor, and pitched in Zalmonah. And they departed from Zalmonah, and pitched in Punon, and then camped at Oboth. They left Oboth, and pitched in Iye-abarim, in the border of Moab." -Numbers 33:2-44


WRITING OF THE AGENT OF Yahweh

The first part of the passage above claims that an agent of YHWH, in this case "Moses," wrote about their exodus under the command of that God. 
The earliest document that provides evidence that an agent of God Yahweh wrote an order related to that God and His people is in the Curse Tablet discovered from the Mt. Ebal's Joshua's altar dated between 1400 and 1200 BCE.


 Take note that it is not dated between 1500 and 1400 BCE.


MIGDOL



The description for Migdol's location here fits what Migdol of Seti was all about which was published in around 1280s BCE in the inscription now known Papyrus Anastasi V 19.2-20.6: it is located to the east of the palace (Pi-Rameses); in addition to this, the Papyrus Anastasi III 2:8-3:3 has Pihahiroth located in Rameses city, whereas Baalzephon to be near Pi-Rameses and Migdol. 

Baalzephon was one of the known places under Egypt in the reign of Rameses II, and which was published around 1225 BCE in the Papyrus Sallier IV 1:16 with the toponym

" b'r dj3pn" ("Baar djepon"),

which could the toponym 

 "Baal- ..." 

in the Papyrus Anastasi III 2:8 - geographically within the sphere of Rameses, Pihahiroth and yam Tuffy in the same passage in 3:3 innumerated around 1211 BCE by a scribe of king Merneptah (Nephtoah). This latter inscription has confirmed Moses' report.

Pihahiroth is the Hebrized rendition for the 1211 BCE Egyptian word 

"pr hwt hrt"

derived from the root word 

הַֽחִירֹ֔ת
"Hahiroth"

mentioned in Numbers 33:8, which was originally from the Egyptian 

"hwt w'rt,"

Grecized into "Auaris" (romanized "Ávaris").

 It was king Amenemhet I (1991-1962 BCE) who founded that "Hwt w'rt" (Avaris), which afterwards became part of the 19th nome.

 During Moses' days, a less significant part of it was renamed "Pi-Hahiroth," the exact date of which is 1211 BCE.

In Papyrus Anastasi III 2:8-3:3, Pihahiroth is described to be in or near the Rameses city.



PAPYRUS ANASTASI III

 Containing didactic excerpts and hymns, and by Armenian merchant Giovanni Anastasi it has reached the British Museum in 1839 (number 10246, 3).

 It locates
Baal-Zephon,
Yam Suph (Reeds' Sea), 
"Rameses," and 
"Pihahiroth" 

in the eastern Delta. This is one of the hardest evidence that biblical Moses is accurate and lived during the time of those toponyms.
 Why? 
Because there is no another document before or after 1211 BCE that has named simultaneously those four name places. Moses confirms the report of Papyrus Anastasi III 2:8-3:3, and vice versa.

The Papyrus Anastasi III inscription is telling Egyptians about...


"the waters of Baal... 
P3-twfy 
(the Tufy) 
comes to papyrus reeds and p3-h-r (the Horus) to rushes. Twigs of the orchards & wreaths of the vineyards [visited by] birds from the Cataract region. It leans upon [the shore of]
 
p3 yam 
[the Sea]

with begi-fish and buri-fish, and even their hinterlands provide it. The Great-of-Victories youths are in festive attire every day; sweet moringa-oil is upon their heads having hair freshly braided. They stand beside their doors. Their hands bowed down with foliage and greenery of

pr-hwt-hrt 
(Pi-Hahirot)

and flax of the Waters-of-Horus. The day that one enters
 
Rameses
wsr-m3'-r' stp-n-r'

L.p.h. ..." - Papyrus Anastasi III, 2:8 -3:3

In this papyrus is mentioned an area called 

"Rameses."
 
It is described here that 
Baal (to the north),
 Pi-Hahirot, and
 Yam Tufy 
were areas located in or just near the area of "Rameses."
The inscription clearly tells us that the said "Rameses" is derived from the name of king Rameses the Great (1279-1213 BCE) as it is mentioning the regnal name " wsr-m3'-r' stp-n-r' " (Usermaatre Setepenre). It also suggests that the name "Tufy" (borrowed by Moses as "suph" or "Suf ") is derived from the word papyrus reeds. This Tufy (Suph) was located near "P3 yam" (which Moses in Numbers 33:8 called "ha yam," meaning "the sea"), which is facing Baalzephon, Pihahiroth and Migdol.
Papyrus Sallier IV, 1:16, written around 1225 BCE, likely identified the toponym "Baal-" here to be 

"b'r  dj3pn"
("Baal-Zephon').

This gives the exact timeframe from what years did Egyptians use the toponyms 

"Baal-zephon,"
"Rameses,"
"Pi-Hahirot,"
and 
"Yam Suf "

and that is between around 1225 and 1200 BCE. 
The most important: this inscription proves that Moses is right in his report that there were toponyms
"Baal-zephon," "Rameses," "Pihahiroth," and "Yam Suf" (Reeds' Sea) during exodus of Israel -which means exodus happened during the days of king Rameses II (1229 BCE). 
Modern feeling-based thinkers discredited this accuracy and like atheists they claim that these toponyms are an anachronism. The basis of this feeling is that Genesis  47:11 mentions too the toponym "Rameses," inclined to the preconceived belief that Moses was not the writer of the original edition of the book of Genesis. Another basis is the belief that Moses does not give the exodus timeframe and therefore the calculation of not-eyewitnes writer must be the source of accurate timeline, even though that writer was more than six hundred years distant from Moses or the exodus.
Nonetheless, Moses and contemporary Egyptian inscriptions are more reliable than any latter feeling-based opinion. If we will use Papyrus Sallier IV as an exodus-date determination, exodus would have happened before 1225 BCE during the time of king Rameses II. 
And yes, according to Moses, the firstborn son of Rameses city died and it resulted to the expulsion of the Hebrews from Rameses. Moses has reported too that this death had affected the Egyptian gods, and the most affected was but Rameses II himself, who that time was functioning as an Egyptian god. All these pieces of information give us a sharp point that the crown prince, who was sitting on the pharaoh's throne, died when the pharaoh (Rameses II) was legally an Egyptian god before 1225 BCE, was no other than but prince Ramesses B junior, who died in 1229 BCE during the Year 50 of king Rameses II the Great. Moses is accurate in his claim that the crown prince was a "firstborn son" and "sitting on the throne of the pharaoh." 
For a crown prince to sit on the throne of his father, his father must have served more than 30 years as pharaoh and must have legally, ritually functioning as an Egyptian god. It was a legal tradition in Egypt that a pharaoh would celebrate his first heb sed (jubilee festival) in his regnal Year 30, and every 3rd year after that. The pharaoh would ritually transform into an Egyptian god of the state in his heb sed festival. The pharaoh during exodus was more than 30 years on throne and ardently functioning his obligation as an Egyptian god, giving him permit to let his crown prince sit on his throne and function as a king of Egypt in his behalf. According to Moses, this crown prince was firstborn son. And yes, prince Ramesses B junior was the firstborn son of Rameses II to Queen Isetnoftet and was made crown prince in 1255 BCE after the unexpected death of the eldest son Amunherkhepeshef and mother Nefertari.
As what we have learned from Anastasi III, there was an every day feast of youths in Pihahiroth, which was in Rameses city. Pihahiroth could not be far from Rameses city as indicated in the following inscription written in circa 1211 BCE:

Festivities of youths were in Pihahiroth in Rameses city.

"The Great-of-Victories youths are in festive attire every day... They stand beside their doors. Their hands bowed down with foliage & greenery of

pr-hwt-hrt 
(Pi-Hahirot) ...

The day that one enters
 
Rameses
wsr-m3'-r' stp-n-r'

l.p.h. ..."  -Anastasi III, 3:3


And this description is accurate because the original Avaris (Hwt w'rt) was 2 kilometers distant from Pi-Rameses and under the ground. There was a day that king entered Rameses city while youths were waiting at their doors with foliage of 

pr hwt hrt 
(Pi-Hahiroth).

 But this turned into a great mourning when the crown prince died in 1229 BCE. This could be the incident that caused Rameses II to be silent about the untoward activities of the troops of Yar-su (Moses), as complained by Ramesses III. The royal scribe of the time has described it this way:


"Behold, things have been done which have not happened for a long time past; the king has been deposed by the rabble." - Admonitions of Ipuwer, VII


Such this incident that took place in 1229 BCE is a confirmation of what Moses has already warned of the Hebrews that ...


"Every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh sitting upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of animals. 
And there shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt, such as there 

was none like it before,

nor shall be like it any more." -Exodus 11:5-6


And yes, not a single firstborn son of Rameses succeeded on the throne because all his firstborn sons died earlier than him. It was his 13th son, prince Merneptah, who successfully succeeded him. This proves that Moses is accurate in the details of his report. Joshua named Merneptah (Nephtoah) by a water supply in the forest of city of Jearim (Josh 15:9 & 18:15).
King Rameses II (1279-1213 BCE) built the largest tomb (KV 5) in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt and he buried there his firstborn son, crown prince Ramesses B junior and all of his children who died before he died. 
That the crown prince was functioning as "king of Egypt" is hinted in the report that he warned Moses of death if the latter would see his face again.


"And Pharaoh said unto him, Get thee from me, take heed to thyself, 

see my face no more;

for in that day thou seest my face thou shalt die. 
And Moses said, Thou hast spoken well, I will see thy face again no more." -Exodus 10:28-29


Why Moses could not see him again?

 
"And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sits upon his throne,..." - Exodus 11:5


It was prophesied. Moses already knew that he would not see again that guy sitting on the pharaoh's throne, because that firstborn son (acting as "pharaoh ") would have died in April of 1229 BCE. 
On contrary, Moses saw again the real pharaoh (the father of the guy who sat on the throne). Again, Moses is proved correct in this minute detail: that the firstborn son was sitting on the throne acting as pharaoh, who warned him not seeing his face again. It was the real pharaoh who summoned Moses and asked and permitted to go in the wilderness as the citizens were afraid of the possible calamities that might have annihilated them by not allowing Hebrews to go to the Land of Yahweh in the wilderness.


"And it came to pass, that at midnight YHWH smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. 
And Pharaoh rose up in the night, he, and all his servants, and all the Egyptians; and there was a great cry in Egypt; for there was not a house where there was not one dead. And he called for Moses and Aaron by night, and said, 
'Rise up, and get you forth from among my people, both ye and the children of Israel; and go, serve YHWH, as ye have said. Also take your flocks and your herds, as ye have said, and be gone; and bless me also.' 
And the Egyptians were urgent upon the people, that they might send them out of the land in haste; for they said, 'We be all dead men.' 
And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about 600 elef strong foot-persons, beside the little ones. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle." -Exodus 12:29-33,37-38


There were 598 elef (or around 600 eleph) in the capital city, and their escape as described in Exodus was permitted by the pharaoh and Egyptians. They went to Succoth, most likely to gather other Hebrews.
An intriguing part of the report is that 

"Also 

עֵ֥רֶב
(Arab/Ereb)

רַ֖ב
(rabh)
 
went up too with them..." - Exodus 12:38


Using the understanding of the word "rabisu" during Akhenaten's days, "rabh" here may mean "general" or officer, whereas "Ereb" translated as "mixed" is understood in 1Kings 10:15 as "Arab" or mixed people. The known mixed people with them were the Kenite Midianites: some traces of Philistine names might have indicated that some of them were relatives of the Philistine (1Sam 15:6, Judg 4:11, Num 10:29-33, Judg 1:16).

Why Hebrews' next station was Succoth?


King Rameses II when erected a stela for Moses on front of the palace in Pi-Rameses stated that "Moses is the beloved of Atum," giving insight that the patron source of Moses is Atum. This Atum could be a deified version of Assyrian "Adamu," known in Babylonian as "Amutu" and in Hebrew as "Adam," who was created from earth - or as Egyptian teaching has had, Atum was created in mound from waters by himself. 
The center or hub of this god Atum was built by Rameses II in Tell el-Retabeh known with the city name "Pr-itm," pronounced by Moses as "Pithom." Some outdated atheists think that Rameses built this Pithom in 7th century BCE, but scientific findings proved that it was built in the 13th century BCE. 
The inhabitants of Pithom were not necessarily Egyptians but people who probably claimed had descended from Atum (Amutu, Adamu, Adam). In archaeological findings, these people were descendants of Hyksos from Syria, corroborating Moses' claim that Hebrews' patriarch came from Aram or Syria (Deut 26:5).
He has also claimed that the Hebrews were tasked to 

"... built for Pharaoh store-cities, Pithom and Raamses." -Exodus 1:11


 Amenmonē verified that the workers of king Rameses II in Delta in building temple or palace in Pi-Rameses were the 'Apiru, also known Habiru (Hebrews).


HABIRU WORKERS

Simultaneous building projects of Rameses II (1279-1213 BCE) required a lot of workers from north to south. Amenmonē was reminded to 


"Give food rations to the soldiers and the Apiru-laborers who are drawing water from the well of Pre of Rameses II, L.p.h., south of Ai-gy-ptos" 

(Leiden Papyrus 349), and 


"Give food rations to the people of the army and to the 'Apiru who are dragging stones for the great pylon [temple gate of Rameses the Great]" (Leiden Papyrus 348).


That Apiru or Habiru were involved in building the projects of king Rameses the Great in Delta is a historical fact. They erected the gate of the temple of the palace of Rameses II in Pi-Rameses, and they could be also the Semitic workers who built Pithom in Tell el-Retabeh in the 13th century BCE.
 According to Inena, scribe of Merneptah in 1206 BCE, Etham and Pithom were in Succoth, where Succoth is what we know today Wadi Tumilat (Papyrus Anastasi 6.51-61). And scientists confirmed that Pithom of king Rameses II was in Wadi Tumilat, specifically in Tell el-Retabeh, in which the Semitic workers constructed 18 feet (6 meters) thick mud-brick defense wall, garrison barracks and granaries. This Pithom was abandoned around 1229 BCE, most likely after Moses entered it after their escape from Rameses.

In this case, Moses is referring to the 13th century BCE Rameses, Pithom, Succoth, and Etham. 


ETHAM MEANS SHUR


Etham could be a corruption of the Egyptian word "khetam," meaning "wall," which Moses has translated into "Shur" ("wall"). The geographical position of this Etham, according to Moses, is in the edge of the wilderness (Num 33:6, Exo 13:20). Wilderness is in the east, and is also called wilderness of Shur (Etham).


"And they departed from before Pihahiroth, and passed through the midst of the sea into the wilderness, and went 3 days' journey in the 



wilderness of Etham, 

and camped at Marah." -Numbers 33:8


"So Moses brought Israel from the Reeds'  Sea, and they went out into the 

wilderness of Shur; 

and they went 3 days in the wilderness, and found no water." -Exodus 15:22
 

Shur is to the south of Kadesh and Gerar or south of Havilah (where the Amalekites lived to the way going to Assurah). 
This Shur is opposite and "near Egypt" (Gen 20:1 & 25:18; 1Sam 15:7 & 27:8 ). 

West of this Shur (Etham) is the wilderness of Reeds' Sea and the way of Reeds' Sea. The way to Shur was called "way of the Reeds' Sea," which is south of the "way to Gerar (the land of the Philistines)." This way is heading toward the territories of the Amalekites in Havilah, Negeb, Kadesh, and Tamar (Exo 13:17-18, Num 14:25). Needless to say, Reeds' Sea (yam suph) is in the west of Etham just on front of Pihahiroth (House of Avaris), whereas the wilderness is in the east.

"And they left Etham, and turned again unto Pihahiroth, which is on front of Baalzephon: and they camped on front of Migdol. And they departed from before Pihahiroth, and passed through the 

midst of the sea 

into the wilderness, and went 3 days' journey in the wilderness of Etham, and encamped at Marah." -Numbers 33:7-8

The water there was probably stagnant, making it an untasteful to drink. 

"And when they came to Marah, they could not drink of the waters of Marah, for they were bitter: therefore the name of it was called Marah." -Exodus 15:23

After asking YHWH, Moses saw a tree and he cast it into the water, which may have turned open and flown the water, giving now a fresh water. 

TAMAR - THE LAND OF PALM TREES
Symbol of Judah's military activity


From Marah they went to Tamar, the land of palm trees, specifically in Elim, where there are many rivers or streams of water. From there they moved to reeds' sea (either another body of water with reeds or a body of water in the way of the Reeds' Sea). Then they went in the wilderness of Sin. 
Sin is singular form of "Sinai." 
From that wilderness they went to Dophka, then to Alush, and then in Mt. Horeb in Rephidim in the area belonged to Kadesh (Exo 17:1-8). 


"... the Negeb country, and dwelled between Kadesh and Shur, and sojourned in Gerar." -Genesis 20:1
 
Gerar was the "land of Philistines," and probably even king Ramesses III (1186-1155 BCE) recognized it as such, and it could be reached by the "way of the land of the Philistines," whereas Kadesh was an inhabiting place of the Amalekites and could be reached by the "way of the Reeds' Sea" passing through the wilderness of Shur (Exo 13:17-18). A particular area of this Kadesh is the station of Miriam and known "Kadesh-barneah" (the name of which signifies exodus, for it means "Holy Ground of the Wandering in Desert"). One of its sites is the wilderness of Zin, in which belonged the Rephidim, where Mt. Horeb was located. According to Moses, Kadesh is in the border of Edom - to the north of west, and he reiterated it by saying that Mt. Hor was in the edge of the land of Edom (Num 29:14,16).


"And they removed from Kadesh, and camped at Mt. Hor, in the edge of the 

land 

of Edom." -Numbers 33:37

The term "eretz" ("land") in this specific passage was an Hebrew translation of the Egyptian hieroglyph "khasut" (depicted as "mountain," but translated as "foreign land"). The edge of mountains here is what we can see as fence of mountains that signifies as the boundary of Edom ("gebul," border, in Num 20:23). One of the possible mounts in that mountainous fence was  Hor-hagidgad, which could be part of the mountains of Moseroth, which probably retains its name to the now Jebel Madeirah, just north of Makhtesh Ramon. Hor-ha-Gidgad could be composed of Mt. Hor and Gudgodah (Deut 10:7).

The root word of Hor-ha-Gidgad and Hor-mah could be what the Egyptians knew as "Khor" (Kharu), whose region is known in the Merneptah Stele as near the site of tribe Israel in 1208 BCE. Horim (Horites), from whom Seir came, were what the Egyptians identified "Kharu." 
The name Mount Horeb, if does not mean "volcanic" or "volcano," could be also derived from "Khor." Needless to say, Kharu were earlier inhabitants of Mt. Horeb, Hor-ha-Gidgad, Mt. Hor, and probably Hormah. In fact, Moses has been describing Hormah to be belonged to Seir (Deut 1:44). In the Bible, Kharu is Horim (Horites) living in Seir. 

MT. HOREB IN REPHIDIM IN KADESH, SOUTH OF ARAD

The incident of hitting a rock, to gush out water, took place in Mt. Horeb at the specific area called Meribah, in Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin near Tamar south of Arad.

"For ye rebelled against my commandment in the desert of Zin, in the strife of the congregation, to sanctify Me at the water before their eyes: that is the water of Meribah in Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin." -Numbers 27:14


"... at the Negeb side toward Teman, the border shall be even from Tamar unto the waters of Meribat-Kadesh, and to the river upon the [Mediterranean] great sea." -Ezekiel 48:28

"Because ye trespassed against me among the children of Israel at the waters of Meribah-Kadesh, in the wilderness of Zin; because ye sanctified me not in the midst of the children of Israel." -Deuteronomy 32:51

At first, on circa May 29, 1229 BCE from the wilderness of Sin, it was the older Hebrews who committed sin at Horeb in Rephidim, hence the exact site was called Massah or "Testing" (Exo 16:1 & 17:1-8, Deut 6:16). At the latter part of the Late Bronze Age Collapse, famine caused by drought became severe that the famous Massah spring ceased to give water again. The next time they went in that place, in 1190 BCE, it was Moses who committed sin because he hit the rock instead to speak on it and praise YHWH to let water gush out, the reason of which why Moses in 1189 BCE was not permitted to enter the Promised Land (Ps 106:32). The site is called Meribah ("Quarrelling") located in Kadesh-barneah (Num 20:1-13, cf. Deut 9:22-23), and since Moses' last year till to the king David's song writer and to prophet Ezekiel, Meribah remains flowing with water (Num 20:13, Deut 33:8, Ps 81:7, Ezek 47:19).

 What this tells us all about? It only assures us that Horeb in Rephidim was located in district of Kadesh-barneah in the part of the wilderness of Zin near Tamar (area of Palm Trees) or central Negeb south of Arad.
Learning that Israel was heading toward the Kenite area, the Amalekites ambushed the hindmost of the Hebrews in Rephidim when they were entering the border of Egypt and Edom in Kadesh-barneah to the wilderness of Sinai, understandably because Kadesh was an Amalekite territory (Exo 17:7-8, Deut 25:17-18, cf. Gen 14:7). It was this Amalek why Moses was ordered and inspired to write a book, most likely the "Wars of YHWH" (Exo 17:14,16, Num 21:14).

"Thus says YHWH of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he ambushed him on the way when he came up from Egypt." -1Samuel 15:2


 The troop of 12 spies has positively identified Amalekites as the inhabitants of Negeb and of the valley in the way of the Reeds' Sea (Num 14:25).

"The Amalekites dwell in the land of Negeb..." -Numbers 13:29


"Behold, I will stand before you there upon the 

rock in Horeb; 

and you shall 

smite the rock, 

and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink. And Moses did so in the sight of the elders of Israel. 
And he called the name of the place 

Massah, and Meribah, 

because of the chiding of the children of Israel, and because they tempted YHWH, saying, Is YHWH among us, or not? 
Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in Rephidim. 
And Moses said unto Joshua, Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek: tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand. 
And Joshua discomfited Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. 
And YHWH said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Yahwe-nissi" -Exodus 17:6-9,13-15

MOSEROTH : MORE THAN ONE MOSERAH

There were more than one Moserah: one was where Mt. Hor or Hor-Gudgodah (Slashing/Happy Mount) is likely located. The other one was the camping site of the children of Levites after passing the wells of the sons of Jaacan. The other troops followed in Bene-Jaakan after staying at Moserah. It was in their time in Jotbathah when Levites were separated to bear the Ark of the Covenant and became focused on ritual activities (Deut 10:6-8). There were troops that went from Abronah to Eziongaber and walked back to wilderness of Zin to meet Miriam's troops perhaps to give respect to the death of Miriam (d. March 31, 1190 BCE), and all of them met in Mt. Hor. This mount is in the edge of Edom in Negeb, south of Arad.

The account in Deuteronomy 10:6-8 suggests that the narrator was present when Aaron died in one of the mountains of Moseroth and it was the Levites who were with Moses, whereas the account in Numbers 33:31-41 suggests that the narrator is telling about the presence of Hebrews when Aaron died (that they deviated from Moseroth going to Bene-jaakan to Hor-hagidgad then to Jotbathah and then to Passage or Abronah going to Ezion-geber, but were forced to go back to Moseroth, specifically to Kadesh when Miriam died and to Mt. Hor after knowing the death of Aaron) in the edge of the land of Edom.
From Mt. Hor they went to Zalmonah, and then to Punon.

Punon was a 13th century BCE toponym mentioned by king Rameses II as "P3wnw," which was well known for its copper production and being connected to Hormah (Tell Masos) and Athika (Timna Valley, Edom). Archaeologically speaking, Moses is accurate in his report that in the 13th-12th centuries BCE, Hormah, Edom, and Punon were connected as they made them their stations. 

The worst path they took was when they walked to the wilderness to the direction of the "way of the Reeds' Sea" to reach Edom, specifically Athika, from Hormah.

"And YHWH listened to the voice of Israel, and delivered up the Canaanites; and they utterly destroyed them and their cities: and he called the name of the place 

Hormah.
 
And they journeyed from Mt. Hor by the 

way of the Red sea, 

to compass the land of 

Edom: 

and the soul of the people was much discouraged because of the way. 
And the people spoke against God and Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the 

wilderness? 

for there is no bread, neither is there any water; and our soul loaths this light bread." -Numbers 21:3-5
 
This destination (Athika in Edom) was expected if Kenite Midianites of Hormah would tell them the good opportunity for them in that area because Queen Tausert kept secret Athika, that even her general Setnakhte and his little kid Ramesses III did not know that Atika exists. Besides, there were a lot of copper there necessary for Israelite weaponry. Another target destination would be Punon (Khirbat Faynān). 





Toponyms


Rameses

Succoth

Etham

Pihahiroth

Baalzephon

Migdol

Marah

Elim Tamar

reeds' sea

wilderness of Sin

Dophkah

Alush

Rephidim Horeb (Massah, Meribah)

wilderness of Sinai 


Kibrothhattaavah

Hazeroth. 

Rithmah

Rimmon-parez

Rissah

Kehelathah

Mt. Shapher. 

Makheloth

Tahath

Tarah

Mithcah. 

Hashmonah [Azmon?]

Moseroth [Moserah]

Benejaakan [wells of the sons of Jaacan], 

 Horhagidgad, 
 
Jotbathah. 

Ebronah, 

Eziongaber

wilderness of Zin

Kadesh

Mt. Hor, in the 

edge of the land of Edom.
 
And Aaron was 123 years old when he died in Mt. Hor. 

Arad the Canaanite, that dwelt in the Negeb 

Mt. Hor

Zalmonah

Punon

Oboth. 

 Iye-abarim, in the border of Moab

YAMHAD KINGDOM

It was the Yaminite tribe of Amorites, semi-nomadic confederation centered on pastoralism-based structure, which evolved from mobile herding...