BOGUS SCIENTIFIC OPINION OF LORENCE GENE COLLINS AGAINST ARK-SHAPED MOUND

He's continuously using his position as a scientist to destroy what scientific instrument can show us by using his opinions or by not presenting scientific images as a counter attack.

He started his internet article with a title and then this paragraph: 

"Lorence Gene Collins                  

Department of Geological Sciences         

California State University Northridge    

Northridge, California 91330-8266

email: lorencecollins@gmail.com"

and ended it with the following line:

"Dr . Lorence G. Collins

Department of Geological Sciences

California State University Northridge

18111 Nordhoff Street

Northridge, CA 91330-8266

FAX 818-677-2820."

And then shamelessly, in his introduction, claims that

" investigators found the boat-like appearance (Figure 2) to be 

only 

superficial."

This claim in his article is a form of lie because investigators in 1960 - 1980 did not dig the deepest portion of the ship-shaped mound to found out that the structure's 

BOAT-LIKE APPEARANCE

would be 

ONLY SUPERFICIAL. 

The horrifying thing on this article is that he is dragging the name of science on this bogus scientific feeling-based opinion by using science publication. He says:

"The above has been published in the Journal of Geosciences Education, v. 44, 1996, p. 439-444..."

Why horrifying? 

Since when that geosciences are using ignorance as a tool to judge or to render bogus scientific opinion? 

("Ignorance" because no one of them really knew its inner 3-D appearance, except that the results of Fasold and Wyatt's testings are not considered valid for personal reasons.)

And to cover up his bogus scientific opinion, he is attacking subsurface scientific data without presenting his counter subsurface data but by stitching his imaginary explanations of some natural geological materials and processes, as if his imaginary opinions are superior than what scientific instruments can show us. 

First of all his bogus opinion that "investigators found the boat-like appearance to be 

only 

superficial"

  uphold by his fans is a lie because no investigators have entered the inner portions of the ship-shaped mound to claim that the boat-like appearance is ONLY SUPERFICIAL. 

And the most important, scientific instruments could slap his face by showing that the boat-like appearance is not just superficial rather even deep inside the said mound. 

If it is ship-shaped down inside the mound, then how natural geological processes could make such a boat-like shape in the soil?

So, we have to remind every one here that sometimes scientist is using his title (the name science) to abuse and mislead or even to lie to his fans. 

So, he has to prove first that there are investigators who entered in it by any means to claim that its boat-like appearance would be ONLY SUPERFICIAL, and he has to prove that it is "ONLY SUPERFICIAL"  by presenting scientific 3-D images of the deeper portions of the said mound.

 

Not because he could lie whenever he wanted to, it immediately means no one will react to his lie.

(Between 8 and 7 meters inside the structure is a boat-like appearance)

I can present direct counter evidence against his bogus scientific feeling-based opinion (which he has stitched from his imagination of natural geological processes). 

Here are scientific images derived from the data of ground penetrating resistivity scanning done in 2014 and so on by other scientists.

(Images released by Anadolu Agency, News Broadcasting System in 2019)

In 3-D images, we can see that deep inside the mound there is a ship-shaped structure, contrary to the bogus scientific feeling-based opinion of the antagonists.